Live Breaking News & Updates on Novacept Inc

Stay updated with breaking news from Novacept inc. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Supreme Court Upholds, But Limits, Assignor Estoppel Doctrine | Burr & Forman


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On June 29, 2021, the Supreme Court limited the doctrine of assignor estoppel that has long prevented inventors from challenging the validity of patents they have assigned to a third party.  The judicially-created doctrine is grounded in fairness and prevents a patent assignor from warranting (at least implicitly) to the buyer that the patent is valid, but then later challenging the validity of the patent.
In
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.
[1], the patent claims a device to treat abnormal uterine bleeding that used a moisture-permeable applicator.  The inventor assigned the patent application for the device to his company, Novacept, Inc., which was later acquired by Hologic, Inc.  The inventor subsequently founded Minerva Surgical, Inc., where he developed and patented a similar device for treating uterine bleeding, but that used a moisture-impermeable applicator.  In the meantime, Hologic f ....

Justice Kagan , Burr Forman , Supreme Court , Minerva Surgical Inc , District Court , Novacept Inc , Hologic Inc , Minerva Surgical , Federal Circuit , நீதி ககன் , பர் ஆடவருக்கான , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , மினெர்வா அறுவை சிகிச்சை இன்க் , மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் , மினெர்வா அறுவை சிகிச்சை , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று ,

US Supreme Court Narrows Assignor Estoppel Doctrine in Continuation Patent Case | Troutman Pepper


On June 29, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., No. 20-440 (June 29, 2021) ( slip opinion).
Minerva involves a challenge to the assignor estoppel doctrine, which is an equitable or court-created rule that prevents a party who assigned a patent from later challenging the validity of the assigned patent in district court. The Court first gave the doctrine its seal of approval in 1924, by ruling that principles of fair dealing should limit an inventor s ability to assign a patent to another for value and then later argue in litigation that the patent is invalid. [i] ....

United States , Justice Elena Kagan , Supreme Court , Minerva Surgical Inc , Formica Insulation Co , Novacept Inc , Court Decision , Hologic Inc , Minerva Surgical , Federal Circuit , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , நீதி எலெனா ககன் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , மினெர்வா அறுவை சிகிச்சை இன்க் , ஃபார்‌மைக காப்பு இணை , நீதிமன்றம் முடிவு , மினெர்வா அறுவை சிகிச்சை , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று ,