Form of identity. compared to dna? they re never going to be they are a technique, they re not even a science, jeff. it is done by nonscientists and it is a nonscience. sit a technique. the idea that fingerprints are somehow not good identification techniques is frankly absurd. but the point is really? jeff, why don t you site the case of the lawyer in oregon who was indicted as a terrorist based on the fbi s fingerprint analysis. yeah, mark. and you site the tens of thousands of people who are in prison because of finger prints. only because they didn t have an expert. let me finish. what i m trying to say is, absence of evidence isn t evidence of absence.
Not even a science, jeff. it is done by nonscientists and it is a nonscience. it a technique. the idea that fingerprints are somehow not good identification techniques is frankly absurd. but the point is really? jeff, why don t you site the case of the lawyer in oregon who was indicted as a terrorist based on the fbi s fingerprint analysis. yeah, mark. and you site the tens of thousands of people who are in prison because of finger prints. only because they didn t have an expert. let me finish. what i m trying to say is,
They re never going to be they are a technique, they re not even a science, jeff. it is done by nonscientists and it is a nonscience. it a technique. i m familiar with what i mean, the idea that fingerprints are somehow not good identification techniques, frankly, absurd. but the point is really? jeff, why don t you cite the case of the lawyer in oregon who was indicted as a terrorist based on the fbi s fingerprint analysis? yeah, mark. and you cite the tens of thousands of people who are in prison because of finger prints. only because they didn t have an expert. let me finish. what i m trying to say is, absence of the famous phrase absence of evidence isn t evidence of absence. if there s not fingerprints, it doesn t mean he didn t touch it. sometimes fingerprints just don t show up.