form of being restrained by individuals. they are available outside the courtroom. as soon as that name is released we know what he s going to do. well, a few things. first, their nonrelease, it s not a small point. you can guarantee that the two trump lawyers are going to have a hellish weekend. it s one thing to prepare solidly to cross-examine someone you know will be, but it could be anyone at all. that s a serious sort of sanction for his misbehavior. but second, yes, it is exactly as you say, there s been on the one hand, judge merchan made quick work of things, but yet there are these eruptions of kind of chaos and stress and we have almost a tale of two trials. and as it goes forward, those will be the sort of high points that people remember and this trial could be really freighted
incident. the congress and i think trey gowdy has done a very good job here. i don t blame him at all, but the lack of time whenever you ve got a case and there s now a two-year gap or three-year gap between the incident when you re actually having hearings that actually count, what happens? the nonrelease of the e-mails, the missing e-mails, the difficulty of the committee getting the data so this lack of time between the very beginning of when this inquiry should have started right when it happened and now in 2015 nothing positive has developed there. trey gowdy will do a good job of putting it back together. but the fact of the matter is the reluctance upon moving forward here does have a significant impact because, look, the public wears out. people want to get on with other things. it s a horrible incident. people will say we re not going to get to the bottom of it three years later maybe we ll never get to the bottom of it. but you re right, the delay hasn t been helpful. n
incident. the congress and i think trey gowdy has done a very good job here. i don t blame him at all, but the lack of time whenever you ve got a case and there s now a two-year gap or three-year gap between the incident when you re actually having hearings that actually count, what happens? the nonrelease of the e-mails, the missing e-mails, the difficulty of the committee getting the data so this lack of time between the very beginning of when this inquiry should have started right when it happened and now in 2015 nothing positive has developed there. trey gowdy will do a good job of putting it back together. but the fact of the matter is the reluctance upon moving forward here does have a significant impact because, look, the public wears out. people want to get on with other things. it s a horrible incident. people will say we re not going to get to the bottom of it three years later maybe we ll never get to the bottom of it. but you re right, the delay hasn t been helpful. n