This was somebody there are people who were skeptical about donald trump from the very beginning. This was Somebody Playing Ball with donald trump and was a supporter and maybe even going to be his Vice President ial candidate. So the fact that hes saying these kinds of things shows that he gave him a fair hearing, was willing to give him a try, and its become pretty clear that this is a highly problematic president. Part of the thing that is worrying to me is were starting to see everything through the prism of heres another twitter scandal, heres another bit of the crazy. How crazy. Youre talking about somebody who has more access to information about threats to america than almost any human being on earth, Senator Corker, saying hes afraid of world war iii, to the paper of record for the country. That should be a full stop, all traffic comes to a halt moment. Because this is a cry for help for the country. And yet but it doesnt come until after donald trump personally insults him on
this idea, like, that somehow bob corker s the republic who s problematic i don t think that s what i was saying, i don t think that s what scott was saying. what a i am saying, i don t th what she s saying is different than what the president is saying. if you re going to take issue with the president which many people do, people can leave or not leave the white house. i don t understand the surprise i guess what i m saying is if she quantities to come out and defend the president, that s her job. i agree with that. she should do that. but she should do it on nonludicrous grounds. yes. she could say i don t think that senator corker is doing well by his people in tennessee because he should have his eyes on tax reform, et cetera, et cetera. it i don t think that was she s criticizing him over twitter? that s nuts. think about that for a second, though. i don t think that would sound any less ludicrous, to use your word. you know, he should keep his eye on tax refor
what i m saying is i think there is i don t think what she s saying is any different than what the president is saying. so if you are going to take issue with the president, which many people do people can leave or not leave the white house. but i don t understand the surprise that what i m saying is, if she wants to come out and defend the president, that s her job. i agree with that. she should do that. but she should do it on nonludicrous grounds. she could say, i don t think senator corker is doing well by his people in tennessee because he should have his eyes on tax reform, et ceterea. she s criticizing him over twitter? that s nuts! i don t think that would just think about that for a second, though. i don t think that would sound any less ludicrous, to use your word, he should keep his eye on tax reform. people are going to say the same thing about the president. i guess, what is the line of defense that you think is worth it? it s the lecturing about twitter when