tonight on all in. breaking news has come in that we are reading across the newswires, guilty. count one. guilty verdict, count two. guilty verdict, count four. so three and four. donald j trump still guilty on 34 felony counts. no one ever says that about me. i would like them to say we are to have a little sorrow for this man. in the republican standardbearer reveals that his conviction is an honor. in a way i am honored. salacious. by the way. and nothing ever happened. if it were george washington, was he a bad boy here, was he a bad boy there? tonight, major questions about the sentencing of donald trump. how is that going to affect the rnc? does he have confinement? if he goes to prison, what does that look like? plus, the trump campaign threats to those who won t back a felon. and why dreams of a hung jury should give us all a little hope. the 12 everyday jurors about it to make a decision based on the evidence and the law. all in starts right now. go
even for the same type of crime they will get a prison term. in this case we have someone who subverted an election, as the jury found, and also has not only been non-repentant, of course, he did not plead guilty to this. he was convicted. that he has constantly thumbed his nose at this judge and system, and has been continuous. yeah, personally my feelings about prison are we wildly over incarcerate, wildly too long sentences, the american sentencing system is messed up. my desire to see a prisoner go to jail is zero. i will say, it is interesting that you know that. i ve been seeing this cavalcade of rich men, generally, elon musk and others being like can you imagine, this is nuts, someone going to jail for this. like yeah, dude, it actually does happen. i had to break it to you. thank you both.
terrible situation what happened, but i don t think you can hang a whole guy s career on a situation like that. because there s no one else they could have chosen. that s because this is deliberate politics at play by the obama administration. you know exactly what s going to come forward from this guy. come on. people will remember who votes for him in the senate hearings because this is somebody who represented a non-repentant cop killer, and it wasn t because oh, he s innocent. we all know he killed him. he shot the cop in cold blood four more times and directly in the face close range so in this instance and that situation, this is not an appropriate appointment and it s quite appalling and in the face that they would even put this guy forward. he s not suitable for that position whatsoever. does that mean any lawyer in the council s office at that time should not be allowed to be in government? i would never make a blanket statement. i m making it on an individual basis.