would lead to a jury trial. they would lead to a jury trial. they would lead to a fixed notice penalty. there would be no witnesses, nojurors who penalty. there would be no witnesses, no jurors who would then become prejudice are influenced by the report because my content. fin the report because my content. on that second point, effectively, the police decide whether or not an offence has been committed and then the police issued the notices. 0n the police issued the notices. on that basis, it would be prejudice themselves, it sounds a bit odd, i must admit, unless, as he said, they think there might be another charge somewhere down the line potentially. 0n the question of people changing their stories, 0n the question of people changing theirstories, if 0n the question of people changing their stories, if people did not commit would be a bit obvious, wooden deck? if they told her one thing and then told the police something different. j thing and then told the police something diffe
by the prosecution. if you go back to the zimmerman case, the jury deliberated for over 16 hours for two days this. jury is not there yet. this jury has been out for about ten hours. but i agree the question on everyone s mind, what is taking them so long. but you ve got to remember, michael dunn did take the witness stand. and i sort of think that what they re doing is taking apart his testimony. if there are a few ojurors that find him credible the jurors are going to walk through all the evidence to find the discrepancies. i think that s why they asked for the gray mannequin that shows the bullet hole trajectories. i think that s why they re asking for an easel so that they can sort of take their notes, take their votes. i think that s why they re asking for the letter that michael dunn wrote to his family, which would show some inconsistencies. i think they re just doing some hard work. i would be surprised, however, if they didn t come down with a verdict tomorrow. it is friday. m