Stay updated with breaking news from No problem. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the lords have thrown the first spanner into the brexit works so carefully constructed by the prime minister, voting to amend the brexit bill to tie the government s hands by giving eu citizens here a guarantee of a right to remain. now the plain truth is, there is little controversy over the substance: the government wants the eu residents herejust as the lords do and the leave campaigners in the referendum did. the issue is about whether you negotiate their guarantee of residence in return for assurances over the rights of the british elsewhere. or should we make the guarantee unilaterally? it was hard fought in the lords today. if we are to be concerned about anybody‘s rights after brexit, to live anywhere on this continent of europe, it should be our concern for the rights of british people to live freely and peacefully in those other parts of europe. somehow or the other, today we seem to be thinking of nothing but the rights of foreigners. my lords. all our deba ....
of stamping on ibrahimovic a couple of minutes earlier at old trafford. sir dave brailsford has written to the government selct committee, investigating doping in sport, and admitted that mistakes have been made with team sky s medical record keeping. in an eight page document he has outlined how the organistaion has improved its parctices and has also given more details of the mystery package sent to sir bradley wiggins after a race in 2011. sir dave brailsford says it was a legal decongestant and says the alleagtions that it was a banned substance are false. here s our sports editor dan roan. what this document does is try and put some more meat on the bones of the explanation that team sky initially came up with, that is was a decongestant, nothing more u ntowa rd tha n a decongestant, nothing more untoward than that. they explained why there was a surplus of the corticosteroid at the velodrome. they admitted records were missing, they ve admitted mistakes. but they ....
pledge, promise, and vow. three words freighted with probity and trust. but, after anything but an explosive budget, a firecracker blew up in the chancellor s face today over the issue of a promise. the question being, why does the government deny breaking a manifesto pledge on national insurance when the 2015 election manifesto clearly said there would be no increase in national insurance for the five years of an incoming conservative government? is it ever right to to promise one thing and do another? the chancellor has raised the hackles of the right wing press, tory backbenchers of many stripes, and the opposition alike. theresa may is in brussels tonight where, at a press conference, probably for the first time in her life, she was hoping for questions about brexit, but was pressed on this instead. i m joined by our political editor, nick watt. what did she had to say about national insurance? she is standing by the fundamental principle of this budget change which ....
if motion stay we ask that you deny it. thank you. thank you i ll give you five minutes for rebuttal. i want to address a couple of quick points. whatever den says about looking at counselor decision-making does not suggest we look behind national security determines made by the president that determination four corners of determination are based on the congressional determination that the country at issue is of different. i thought you were using den and mandel as your now you re saying it s distinguishable, are you relying on those cases or not? we are relying on them for the limits that the court reviews this issue. i m adding when you have a document itself and that s best evidence of intent of the president relies excluively on the cause made by congress by the safety concerns presented by the countries at issue that is the end of the inquiry and should be. the fact i know counsel for the other side cited this court car danous decision and they in dedescribing t ....
e-mails. and then the letters comey sent to the hill, one saying we found more e-mails on anthony weiner s laptop that could be pertinent to our investigation, we need to look at those, and then his follow-up letter a few days before the election in which he said, we ve done that review and we haven t had anything. hillary clinton herself has said she thinks that first letter in late october changed the course of the election. so, the inspector general is going to look at that and a couple of ancillary things. there have been allegations that an fbi deputy director should have taken himself off part of this case because of some connections to the campaign or his wife s connections to the political to politics in virginia. some allegations that an assistant attorney general for legislative affairs passed information along to the clinton campaign, and other employees disclosed nonpublic information. the foeklecal point is the two actions by the fbi director, the letter to the hill ....