through the inner agency review, had other departments sign off despite the reporting that said it was otherwise. but is this a betrayal? david, let me answer glenn so we can be polite now, huh? what the answer is that we went through the process. the office of legal compliance came back and said this say compliant executive order, it s fully legal and it can be executed. so then for the attorney general to turn around and say i m not going to uphold this lawful executive order is clearly a dereliction of duty and she should have been removed and she was. it is odd to me that we re having a discussion about somebody whose job it is to execute lawful orders, who chose not to do it, hold on, who chose not to do t and then we re questioning whether or not we were right to remove her. that s the right thing to do. if you looked at the folks from the right and the left constitutional scholars said we might not agree with some of the policies or the political or the party of the presiden
but would you want the senate to vote to expel him? it s too early for me to say what the ethics committee recommendation would be. and obviously, i came out against roy moore very essential, in fact before these terrible allegations were levied against him because i was concerned about his performance as a member of the alabama supreme court when he had been removed twice, failing to follow lau lawful orders. these allegations are extremely disturbing. but under the constitution, the test on whether or not you seat someone is whether they satisfy the age and residency requirements. so we would have to seat him,