the prosecutors said they would introduce testimony about weinstein, the judge said i would allow that and led him not to testify in his defense at trial. and it s become something suzanne foreshadowed a moment ago, an appeal issue in the weinstein case. so, too, here. i m really glad to see the judge taking his time to think through these issues for monday. the prosecutors i think according to the news transcripts have offered three rationales for introducing this evidence. one is repeated fraud and illegality by the defendant, donald trump. that s a tough argument because the fact that you committed one crime doesn t necessarily mean you have propensity to commit another. the second, the one you were seizing on, i think is the strongest about credibility. and in particular, the prosecutor today talked about wanting to introduce evidence in the gag order proceedings in new york because there the judge summoned trump to the stand and found afterward that he had lied
right now and what republican politics is like right now, it s worth noting at this juncture it is, in fact, possible to be the front-runner in iowa if you re an isolationist. it s possible to be the front-runner in iowa without winning the murdoch primary. without getting fox news on your side. to spend a little time trolling through fox news channel news transcripts lexisnexis searching for the words ron paul shows what it means in 2011 to lose the fox news channel murdoch primary. i think right now anybody other than ron paul could beat obama if the election were tomorrow. ron paul to me is just a complete distraction. look, there is no foreign policy. there s no commander in chief because his notion of foreign policy is impossible. single handedly be responsible for the re-election of obama, you would think is the very thing that he doesn t want. i absolutely, positively guarantee you if ron paul is
and so, yeah, it was aimed at so many things, keith. remember he is fundamentally a book-seller at this point. he s got to keep the market ready for his book which he declared on the show will be ready a year from now. and he ll want to come back on that same show to sell the book a year from now. he can t let that book become a stale commodity a year from now. so he s going to continue to keep the flames going, the marketing flames going on that. and then he does have history he s contending with. he knows what s on the record. he knows what s going to be revealed long term as more and more documents become unclassified over time. and he knows that he s going to have to be the voice on the record of these news transcripts defending what you find out about him on the record of his own white house. what s he going to call this book? because i was thinking maybe a healthy dose of thank you, george bush, would probably no
heavy drone program that president obama has targeted toward al qaeda. so, y so, yeah, it was aimed at so many things, keith. remember, he is, fundamentally, a book seller at this point. he has to keep the market ready for his book, which he declared on the show, will be ready a year from now, and he ll come back on the show to sell the book a year from now. he can t let that book become a stale commodity a year from now. so he ll continue to keep the flames going, the marketing flames going on that. and then he does have history he s contending with. he knows what s in the record. he knows what s going to be revealed long-term as more and more documents become unclassified over time. and he knows that he s going to have to be the voice on the record of these news transcripts, defending what you find out about him on the record of your own white house. what s he going to call this book? i was thinking, maybe a healthy dose of thank you, george bush, would probably no longer work desp
qaeda. and so, yeah, it was aimed at so many things, keith. remember he is fundamentally a book-seller at this point. he s got to keep the market ready for his book which he declared on the show will be ready a year from now. and he ll want to come back on that same show to sell the book a year from now. he can t let that book become a stale commodity a year from now. so he s going to continue to keep the flames going, the marketing flames going on that. and then he does have history he s contending with. he knows what s on the record. he knows what s going to be revealed long term as more and more documents become unclassified over time. and he knows that he s going to have to be the voice on the record of these news transcripts defending what you find out about him on the record of his own white house. what s he going to call this book? because i was thinking maybe a healthy dose of thank you, george bush, would probably no longer po work despite his lip service there about iraq. h