Thats why we have a president. You will concede that. I think thats a valid argument and thats the argument that was made. Thats one of the arguments that persuaded the Supreme Court today. Although, keep in mind, that the court only lifted the stay. It will hear the merits of the case in october. But, yes, you are right. But, as i said, the stronger argument against this travel ban is its really bad policy. It doesnt accomplish the goal which is notomake america safer. Tucker it doesnt. You would argue the counter case that the more immigrants that we have from say somali coming into the country the safer we are . What point are you making. What i would argue on Policy Grounds this ban is both too broad and not broad enough. Let me explain. Heres why its too broad. It denies muslims from six predominantly muslim countries. Tucker let me stop and correct you. It makes no reference to religion at all. It doesnt badge muslims. It bans people who live in six countries the Obama Administra
Predictive journalism: On the role of computational prospection in news Media
cjr.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from cjr.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
again where he s kept off the facebook and twitter. he hasn t been able to push the same news narratives in the way that he had been during his presidency and during the 2015-2016 campaign. so, you know, the issue here is that he s going to be able to use this as a grievance campaign, as he always has. right when this ban lifts, even perhaps with some restrictions after that, is going to be in january of 2023, right in time for if and when he decides to run again for president in 2024. so dominico, the former president s blog got paltry engagement. despite a strong following on social media before being banned, we all remember the numbers and how much he touted them, but how pivotal will the next few months be for trump for keeping his grip on the gop if he does not have these platforms online? i don t think that the
much more profound. the constitution explicitly forbids presidents making money by being president. that is called the emolliaments clause. this could be connected to a much deeper issue of corruption which makes me surprised that he has chosen this golf course. he only owns it because of loans he got from deutsche bank at a time when deutsche bank was the only bank loaning to him and also at a time when deutsche bank was deeply involved in laundering money for very suspicious foreign investors. it is odd to me he would want to draw attention to this particular property at this particular time. circling back to the conversation about impeachment and what the founding fathers were worried about in establishing the system as it is there s been some criticism of the democrats and how they are conducting their impeachment inquiry. they are not holding the hearings we had this past week in the open. should they be doing it in the open to combat fake news narratives? i think there are an