Democrats are considering going it alone with a much more expansive and expensive bill. The latest on these negotiations. Good evening, bret. Tonights meeting is the first time that President Biden has invited them to the white house and all of them are republicans. Whether or not he is willing to compromise or not to earn their support is still very much. Go big or go bipartisan. Thats the question President Joe Biden faces as he attempts to pass his 1. 9 trillion stimulus package. The president calls for bipartisan support and 10 moderate republican senators responded to the roughly 600 billion plan of their own. Im going to do everything i can to encourage the president to do something that is much more targeted from the 1. 9 trillion package. He was one of the ten moderates to send a letter to him on sunday reminding him of the promise tomorrows going to be it looks like you are in the snow globe at the white house. Thank you. Down the street from the bipartisan meeting in the oval
Vote the clerk mr. Merkley, aye. The clerk ms. Collins, aye. Mr. Schumer, aye. The clerk mr. Cramer, aye. The clerk mr. Ossoff, aye. The clerk mrs. Fischer, no. The clerk mrs. Capito, aye. Mr. Cassidy, aye. The clerk mr. Rubio, aye. Ms. Stabenow, aye. The clerk mr. King, aye. The clerk ms. Hassan, aye. Mr. Coons, aye. Mr. Murphy, aye. The clerk mr. Scott of florida, aye. The clerk mr. Mullin, no. Mr. Whitehouse, aye. Mr. Bennet, aye. The clerk mr. Brown, aye. Mr. Kelly, aye. Mr. Sanders, aye. Ms. Ernst, aye. Mr. Fetterman, aye. The clerk mr. Moran, aye. The clerk mr. Booker, aye. The clerk ms. Cantwell, aye. Vote the clerk ms. Rosen, aye. The clerk mr. Menendez, aye. The clerk mr. Risch, no. The clerk mr. Budd, aye. The clerk mr. Barrasso, aye. The clerk mr. Kennedy, aye. The clerk mr. Hawley, no. Mr. Schmitt, no. Mr. Daines, no. The clerk mr. Hickenlooper, aye. The clerk ms. Murkowski, aye. Mr. Sullivan, no. Mr. Hagerty, no. The clerk mr. Braun, no. Ms. Lummis, aye. The clerk mr. Mcco
Punishment clause governs which punishments are permitted. Not what conctan be prohibited. Second, n precedent supports the ninth circuit rule. Instead they misread robinson to bar any punishment for involuntary conduct lketo a status. But robinlls only that states cannot outlaw the status of drug addiction. It made clear they can phibit conduct like drug use could this court should not rewrite robinson six decades later thir the ninth circuits approachroven unworkable. The eighth amendment does not tell courts o is involuntarily homesswhat shelter is adequate, or wme, place and manner relations are allowed. T in 35 suits and countin federal courts are now deciding everything from the exact size of campsites to the adequacy of empty beds at specic shelters like the Gospel Rescue Mission rants pass. Ancies are struggling to apply arbitrary shifting stdards in the field. Thisourt should reverse and and the failed experiment which s eled the spread of encampments while harming those it pu
First, the cruel and unusual punime clause governs which punishments are permitted. Not what conduct can be prohibited. Second, no precedent spos the ninth circuit rule. Instead they misread robinson to bar any punishment for involuntary conduct linked to a status. But robinson tells on tt states cannot outlaw the status of drug addiction. It made clear they can prohibit conduct like drug use could this court should not rew robinson six decadesat third, the ninth circuits approach has proven woable. The eighth amendment does not tell courts who is involuntarily homeless, what slt is adequate, or what time, ple and manner relations are allowe but in 35 suits and counting feral cous are now deciding everything from the ect size of campsites to the adequacy of empty beds at specific shelters like the Gospel Rescue Mission in grants and cities aretrgling to apply arbitrary shifting standards t field. This court sulreverse and and the failed eerent which has fueled t sead of encampmentshile
Penalty fees for violations begin at 295. In 2018 Gloria Johnson filed a suit where he District Court ruled the ordinances constituted cruel and unusual punishment against the homeless because they have no access to shelter. On appeal the court of appeals for the ninth circuit also ruled in favor of the Homeless People. The u. S. Supreme court now has through june 2024 to issue a ruling. Like cities nationwide grants pass relies on camping laws to protect its public spaces. These generally applicable laws prohibit specific conduct and are central to Public Health and safety. The ninth circuit tied cities hands by constitutionalize and the policy over how to address growing encampments. Foreign grants pass from enforcing its camping laws is wrong. For three reasons. First, the cruel and unusual punishments claus governs which punishments are permitted. Not what conduct can be prohibited. No precedent supports the ninth circuits rule. Respondents in the United States instead misread robi