update the statute to codify a warrant for content standard as many of you know. it makes distinctions, i think, that don t comport with users reasonable expectations of privacy today. at the heart of service providers, it s this notion of 180-day rule where contents of your communications are subject to the warrant requirement up until 180 days and thereafter at the 181st day all of a sudden can be subpoenaed. all right today in the sixth circuit companies like google require a warrant for all content regardless of the age, regardless of where it is stored and when it has been opened or when it has been opened. there is legislation that is pending in congress has been pending. right now, it has over 250 co-sponsors in the house of representatives. if it were voted on today in the house, it would pass. i have a lot of confidence that the same results would be true in the senate. not the least of which, it helps to pave the way for future as many of you know in the next coupl
but yet, this is reiterating carissima sport. but hercules jumped out well, dworkin is hercules jumped out at us because it was the closest thing you get to like this is hercules is not a robot, but it shares a lot of the same features that we could imagine of the robot. so that was one of the reasons why dworkin found his place therefore sure. in terms of, just one more point since carissima brought it up about cast some sting. for us what we hope with part of an interesting contribution with this paper was that people who are commenting in the field and some sting as a good example of that have been so focused on the question of functional capacity. and the debate so far is always a question of will we ever get there, like at the end of yesterday s panel the question was, you know, how far or close are we to those kind of things that is a useful question to think about whether personhood is ever going to be on the table. but what we wanted to do in this paper was not sort
we pushed for that. we wanted that. we will we think the labeling is very important. we are also confirmed book what we are all stashed what we are also concerned about is we do not have a public education campaign. there are banner ads and social media telling youth not to use this product and that it is damaging to developing brains. colorado and, i might add, washington state has not quite opened their stores yet and they already have that campaign going. we have 340 stores your. we just haven t gotten a rolling it. guest: we will take a call from sam in iowa. caller: i am glad they are protecting juveniles from this. my problem is the 18 to 21-year-olds. they can hold a gun and fight for our country at 18 years old. but they are not allowed to smoke a plant because they are still considered children. we have had the edible marijuana in california for years. we don t have any of those crazy things you re talking about where people kill themselves over it. host:. i wi
believes he s a human being marrying another human being. finally, you have the idea which is that in oshd torder to fit jurist, you have to understand, sympathize and use the norms of your community because that s part of the complicated relationship there dworkin s thought, a fit between what you want to say and the justification of those norms. here again, i had some thoughts. i don t think the point that is made in this paper, i think it s a bit too strong. first of all, once again, many people come to yale law school from many countries around the world. they are not americans. they have been exposed to american culture through tuition, perhaps. and they re ab mere fact that y not share a community s norms does not qualify you making good, legal arguments. secondly, it s a very strange argument to come from two canadians. after all, canada is part of the british commonwealth. one thing we know about the british commonwealth is that british commonwealth exported colon
missouri, with what could be a critical piece in the puzzle about what really happened when darren wilson shot and killed michael brown. there s new audio recorded by a man who lives nearby. his attorney says he caught the incident on tape as he was talking with a friend on video chat. cnn cannot independently confirm whether it was definitely the michael brown shooting that is on this recording. the fbi, however, has spoken to the man who recorded it, and the man is being analyzed by experts to see what information can possibly be drawn from it. ted rowlands tonight brings us up to date. reporter: it s the critical moment caught on audio tape, and it could be a key piece of evidence as investigators work to determine exactly what happened between michael brown and ferguson police officers, darren wilson. the shots can be heard in the background of an online video chat. you are pretty [ gunfire ] you re so fine. [ gunfire ] it s electronic, it s objective. it doesn t