Ne Who Finances Terrorism News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Ne who finances terrorism. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Ne Who Finances Terrorism Today - Breaking & Trending Today

CHR seeks clarification on 'contentious' ATA provisions

MANILA - The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) on Sunday said it welcomes the recent Supreme Court (SC) ruling on the constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) but expects the high court to clarify its stand on the remaining "contentious" provisions. CHR spokesperson, lawyer Jacqueline Ann de Guia, said in a statement that the CHR has consistently recognized the need to "combat terrorism as a means to pursue the people's right to life, liberty, and physical security". "The CHR partly welcomes the decision of the Supreme Court declaring as unconstitutional parts of Section 4 that vaguely and broadly defines acts of terrorism, and Section 25, particularly the second mode of designating individuals, groups, organizations, or associations as a terrorist, one who finances terrorism, or as a terrorist organization or group," De Guia said. De Guia said the Supreme Court's decision is an affirmation that activism is not an act of terrorism. "Ad ....

Commission On Human Rights , Supreme Court , Department Of Justice , Department Of The , Human Rights , Anti Terrorism Act , Jacqueline Ann De Guia , National Task Force , End Local Communist Armed Conflict , Local Government , Manila The Commission On Human Rights Chr Sunday Said It Welcomes Recent Supreme Court Sc Ruling Constitutionality Of Anti Terrorism Act Ata But Expects High To Clarify Its Stand Remaining Quot Contentious Provisions Spokesperson , Lawyer Jacqueline Ann De Guia , Aid Ina Statement That The Chr Has Consistently Recognized Need To Quot Combat Terrorism Asa Means Pursue People 39s Right Life , Nd Physical Security Quot The Chr Partly Welcomes Decision Of Supreme Court Declaring As Unconstitutional Parts Section 4 That Vaguely And Broadly Defines Acts Terrorism , Nd Section 25 , Articularly The Second Mode Of Designating Individuals , R Associations Asa Terrorist , Ne Who Finances Terrorism , R Asa Terrorist Organization Or Group , Uot De Guia Said The Supreme Court 39s Decision Is An Affirmation That Activism Not Act Of Terrorism Quot Addressing Acts Terror Also Crucial In Realizing Our Right Toa Peaceful And Secure Environment Where We Can All Enjoy Social Economic Development But Doing So , E Should Not Compromise All Other Human Rights , Uot She Said De Guia Added There Isa Need To Clarify That Punishments Under The Law Must Be Based On Terroristic Acts And Not Mere Free Exercise Of Rights Noted Activism Is Part Ofa Quot Healthy Functional Democracy , N Which Citizens Can Express And Demand Redress For Grievances Quot Chr Remains Hopeful That The Remaining Contentious Provisions Will Be Clarified By Supreme Court Once It Releases Full Text Of Decision , Uot De Guia Said , Eferring To Provisions On Warrantless Arrest , Xtended Detention Without Formal Charge ,

CHR seeks clarification on 'contentious' ATA provisions

MANILA - The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) on Sunday said it welcomes the recent Supreme Court (SC) ruling on the constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) but expects the high court to clarify its stand on the remaining "contentious" provisions. CHR spokesperson, lawyer Jacqueline Ann de Guia, in a statement, said the CHR has consistently recognized the need to "combat terrorism as a means to pursue the people's right to life, liberty, and physical security". "The CHR partly welcomes the decision of the Supreme Court declaring as unconstitutional parts of Section 4 that vaguely and broadly defines acts of terrorism, and Section 25, particularly the second mode of designating individuals, groups, organizations, or associations as a terrorist, one who finances terrorism, or as a terrorist organization or group," De Guia said. De Guia said the Supreme Court's decision is an affirmation that activism is not an act of terrorism. "Addres ....

Commission On Human Rights , Supreme Court , Department Of Justice , Department Of The , Human Rights , Anti Terrorism Act , Jacqueline Ann De Guia , National Task Force , End Local Communist Armed Conflict , Local Government , Manila The Commission On Human Rights Chr Sunday Said It Welcomes Recent Supreme Court Sc Ruling Constitutionality Of Anti Terrorism Act Ata But Expects High To Clarify Its Stand Remaining Quot Contentious Provisions Spokesperson , Lawyer Jacqueline Ann De Guia , Cna Statement , Aid The Chr Has Consistently Recognized Need To Quot Combat Terrorism Asa Means Pursue People 39s Right Life , Nd Physical Security Quot The Chr Partly Welcomes Decision Of Supreme Court Declaring As Unconstitutional Parts Section 4 That Vaguely And Broadly Defines Acts Terrorism , Nd Section 25 , Articularly The Second Mode Of Designating Individuals , R Associations Asa Terrorist , Ne Who Finances Terrorism , R Asa Terrorist Organization Or Group , Uot De Guia Said The Supreme Court 39s Decision Is An Affirmation That Activism Not Act Of Terrorism Quot Addressing Acts Terror Also Crucial In Realizing Our Right Toa Peaceful And Secure Environment Where We Can All Enjoy Social Economic Development But Doing So , E Should Not Compromise All Other Human Rights , Uot She Said De Guia Added There Isa Need To Clarify That Punishments Under The Law Must Be Based On Terroristic Acts And Not Mere Free Exercise Of Rights Noted Activism Is Part Ofa Quot Healthy Functional Democracy , N Which Citizens Can Express And Demand Redress For Grievances Quot Chr Remains Hopeful That The Remaining Contentious Provisions Will Be Clarified By Supreme Court Once It Releases Full Text Of Decision , Uot De Guia Said , Eferring To Provisions On Warrantless Arrest ,