Live Breaking News & Updates on National Security Adviserhr |Page 3
Stay updated with breaking news from National security adviserhr . Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The russian committee flag. of course, they will keep doping, there is no actually punishment. reporter: jake, this is exactly what you get. frankly, the ioc deserves this they have been playing along with russia, putin who hosted the 2024 games where i am sure many with the urine going through the hole in the wall, clean urine coming back. that was the olympics that putin hosted. they have been doing this eight years. the ioc let them do it. it s finally blown up. we can only imagine with the russians stealing their olympics with a story that has swallowed up everything else at these games. thank you so much. appreciate it. coming up, the numbers behind one of the most watched games in the world. that s next. ....
The national security adviser mike flynn was having conversations with the russian government that he was lying to everybody about. got it. the vice president personally going down to the situation room to review the transcripts of the intercepted phone calls between kislyak and flynn? okay, that s interesting. the vice president s assertions about what he knew about mike flynn and when on flynn s calls to russia, on flynn s discussions about sanctions with russia, on flynn s work as a foreign agent during the campaign, on flynn bringing his son on board during the trump transition, on a lot of different things between pence and flynn, it has all been super tenuous in terms of the vice president s knowledge and his public statements. so placing the vice president personally in the situation room, personally analyzing and reading flynn s transcribed calls with the russians, that s fascinating. but, hey, this is dangling out there as a thread to pull now. woodward is indicating here that ....
There is a whole bunch of news in it. part of the reason i want to talk to mr. woodward about the book, instead of just marinating in it like i have the last few days is because in my reading of this book, a lot of the holy guacamole, that seems important moments, it seems to me they are raised. they are reported out by member woodward, but then i don t know where they go. and they re sort of left for you to ponder. and that s not at all a criticism of mr. woodward or the book. what it means i think is that this is meant to be a jumping off point for more reporting. and frankly, for calls for explanation from people who are quoted in the book in relation to these provocative but open-ended assertions. let me give you an example. this is from page 230 of the book. quote, on july 25th this is 2017, last year the president again berated national security ....
And woodward continues, that nailed the story. and it explained putin s curiously passive response to the sanctions. normally the russian president would be expected to retaliate, expelling some americans from russia. but the day after obama announced the sanctions during the presidential transition, putin announced that he would not retaliate. president-elect trump praised putin, tweeting great move on delay by vladimir putin. i always knew he was very smart. and then woodward says this. the sequence suggested that trump might have known of flynn s role, but it was unclear what flynn had said to the president about his conversations with kislyak. so new detailed reporting on who, what, where, and when in terms of figuring out that, yes, the national security adviser mike flynn was having conversations with the russian government that he was lying to everybody about. got it. the vice president personally going down to the situation room to review the transcripts of the ....
This book, a lot of the holy guacamole, that seems important moments, it seems to me they are raised. they are reported out by member mr. woodward, but then i don t know where they go. and they re sort of left for you to ponder. and that s not at all a criticism of mr. woodward or the book. what it means i think is that this is meant to be a jumping off point for more reporting. and frankly, for calls for explanation from people who are quoted in the book in relation to these provocative but open-ended assertions. let me give you an example. this is from page 230 of the book. quote, on july 25th this is 2017, last year the president again berated national security adviser h.r. mcmaster. he had no interest in allies, trump said. he didn t want any troops in south korea, even when reminded about the differential between the seven seconds it would take ....