Kicking donald duck, that this had just gone so far, maybe too far. Was there not an argument, especially since theyve brought in an outside expert they didnt just sit there and try to do this themselves, they went to a person respected by both sides and said, give us a fair map, which you now see on the right. Was this technically the wrong thing to do . Maybe is it not for the best . Well, first of all, i would dispute that the expert was somebody accepted by both sides. We didnt know him, so number one. Number two but i will say, ive seen republicans as well give him kudos for previous work. Lets just say for the sake of argument that the other map, you know, was not was not contiguous and compact enough. Theres a process here, and theres a legislature. Theres a judicial theres a democratic process for fixing these things. Now, for five judges on the Supreme Court to stand up and tell the General Assembly that they know better, that in 16 days you guys have to draw a new map, and if