they will ask for a change of venue. i want to bring in our analysts. mark and nathalie were on opposite sides of the george zimmerman trial with mark leading the zimmerman defense. nathalie, dunn shot ten times, three as the teen s suv was driving away. three shots at davis alone. were you surprised dunn was not convicted of first degree murder? yes, i was. you usually have more to say. you sound pretty muted. i was surprised like everyone else. this verdict really hurt. we know the kids did not have a gun. we know there was no reason for him to shoot at all. we know he was not feeling threatened because there was no gun. how do we protect our children if we have to protect them from imaginary threats all the time? and from people running to them. this was a mind your business.
he went to these kids and told them to turn down their radio. mark, what is your take on this? do you agree with her in this case? or no? i think that this was a frustration for black americans because i think they looked at the dunn case as being an opportunity to sort of get an indictment on the american justice system because of the way it has been treating young black males and missed the opportunity with the dunn case. i understand the frustration. it is presented the same way with the charges to george zimmerman. i think it was less of a reason for that. i think much more of a bad fit. in this case i understand the frustration. i think the jury really thought the case through. i think the three attempted second degree murder charges were appropriate because at the very least the last three shots that dunn fired were never justified under almost any set of circumstances. but i disagree with nathalie a