the kincade fire in sonoma county has grown and forcing new evacuations. take a look at this map. the purple you see here, there s a lot of it. the are areas where people have been told to get out before it s too late. more than 90,000 people have been told to evacuate in sonoma county today alone making it the largest evacuation in county history. here s the latest on the fire. it scorched nearly 26,000 acres and destroyed 77 buildings. now, that number includes 31 homes. firefighters say the flames are only 11% contained. we have a team of reporters covering this fire since it started. let s head out to nbc bay area sergio quintana live in santa rosa. sergio, you re at a hospital that s, evacuated. reporter: yeah, the expanded mandatory 6:00 or just after 6:00 this evening. included in that expanded evacuation zone which basically doubled the evacuation area of this county is sutter santa rosa hospital. nearly immediately after they made that announcement they started
histories. place children, families and seniors directly in the path of a large homeless population is dangerous and responsible and wrong. this is not about placing navigation centres where homeless are because the add mittanchomeless. if the port s goal is to reduce homelessness on port property, the proposed navigation centre will do the exact opposite. navigation centres should be located in areas where they will not pose a threat to safety and families. no one will consider locating a centre in the middle of seacliff or pacific heights. why blaz place this in the middf our thriving community. the city is imposing this on the port, businesses and friends, families, joggers, cyclists, sport s fans, mayor typ maritimd everyone else. this is merely a prop box but a prop-up for four years. the city should look into permanent navigation solutions and investments. tomorrotom portland, please. this centre will be a magnet for homeless and there are risks to the public safety a
if the port s goal is to reduce homelessness on port property, the proposed navigation centre will do the exact opposite. navigation centres should be located in areas where they will not pose a threat to safety and families. no one will consider locating a centre in the middle of seacliff or pacific heights. why blaz place this in the middf our thriving community. the city is imposing this on the port, businesses and friends, families, joggers, cyclists, sport s fans, mayor typ maritimd everyone else. this is merely a prop box but a prop-up for four years. the city should look into permanent navigation solutions and investments. tomorrotom portland, please. this centre will be a magnet for homeless and there are risks to the public safety and i should not have to walk out my door and fear for my personal safety on a daily basis. this is not what our residential nakeneighborhood wants or needs. it s time the city started caring more about residents and pay the tax and stop
homelessness on port property, the proposed navigation centre will do the exact opposite. navigation centres should be located in areas where they will not pose a threat to safety and families. no one will consider locating a centre in the middle of seacliff or pacific heights. why blaz place this in the middf our thriving community. the city is imposing this on the port, businesses and friends, families, joggers, cyclists, sport s fans, mayor typ maritimd everyone else. this is merely a prop box but a prop-up for four years. the city should look into permanent navigation solutions and investments. tomorrotom portland, please. this centre will be a magnet for homeless and there are risks to the public safety and i should not have to walk out my door and fear for my personal safety on a daily basis. this is not what our residential nakeneighborhood wants or needs. it s time the city started caring more about residents and pay the tax and stop forcing this. nancy floyd and wa