officially taken ownership of twitter, announcing the bird is freed. and promising to loosen speech restrictions. even before yesterday s events many were fearful. according to critics, elon musk s takeover actually threatens free speech and could, quote, ruin america. and alienating users. in fact what twitter needs is more regulation, not less. and they had nothing on elon musk and asking, of course, is donald trump coming back. taylor lore rez tweeted this, it s like the gates of hell opened on this site. and then there was former president trump s own take on truth social. he said i m very happy that twitter now is in sane hands and will no longer be run by radical left maniacs that run our country. all of that after we learned that intruders on friday morning had broken into the house of nancy pelosi and attacked her 82-year-old husband paul. the alleged assail lent is now charged with attempted homicide with other crimes after reportedly attacking paul pelosi in his hom
You look at the peer group, meta and snap, they re down around 40% to 70%. when musk acquired, $33, at a natural level of 10 or 14 bucks, so you have a company that is not worth about $10 billion, $12 billion generously that he paid $44 billion for. he said to advertiserers i bought twitter because i wanted a place for free discourse. he bought twitter because the delaware chancery court was about to make him. ago of yesterday, $33 million has been especially torched. it s the second worse acquisition just behind, you ll like this, aol s acquisition of time warner. $33 billion went up in smoke yesterday. in the end, a decision has to be made about donald trump? is it a pure business calculation? are we going to sell more widgets with him or without him? i mean, what is the approach to that question? i think what we forget sometimes in business is that people making these decisions