Was about having the chance to not talk notjust about a particular Step Or Tactic but a strategy in relation to ukraine. Vladimir putin says lifting these restrictions would represent the nato alliances direct participation in the ukraine war. We heard the same argument from Russias Representative at the un. Translation if the decision to lift restrictions is really taken, from that moment, nato countries are conducting direct war with russia. In this case, we will have to take the relevant decisions with all the consequences for this that the western aggressors would face. Ukraine very much wants to be able to use these weapons. Our Security Correspondent Gordon Corera explains why. These are the western weapons at the heart of todays debate. They include american atacms and this, the british Storm Shadow system, which has a range of at least 250 kilometres. Storm shadow has already been used by ukraine against a russian base in occupied crimea last year, but up until now the countri
It s fu him to end this but today was about having the chance to not talk about a tactic but a strategy in relation to ukraine. Russia s president vladimir putin says lifting these restrictions would represent the nato alliance s direct participation in the ukraine war. We heard the same argument from russia s representative at the un. Translation: if the decision to lift restrictions is really taken, from that moment, nato countries are conducting direct war with russia. In this case, we will have to take the relevant decisions with all the consequences for this that the western aggressors were phase. Ukraine very much wants to be able to use these weapons. Our security correspondent gordon corera explains why. These are the western weapons at the heart of today s debate. They include american atacms and this, the british storm shadow system, which has a range of at least 250 kilometres. Storm shadow has already been used by ukraine against a russian base in occupied crimea last year,
conservatives or libertarians or republicans, we have a gate that prevents the barbarians from storming and on january 6th we became the barbarians, we don t like that. having said that, it would be fun to do a hearing on the crime wave and interview the police from seattle, portland, minneapolis, new york city just to provide real context about actual threats to democracy. we are being lectured by phony politicians about threats to our country while they ignore a mounting pile of dead end it s all for politics. i also reject the idea that having politicians jobs disrupted for two hours is somehow worse than billions of dollars in distraction and dozens of deaths including police officers. that s why i would like to see a hearing about that because i am not i can t stomach the crying, i can t stomach the crying. i saw some really bad stuff last year and none of those people
americans. purdue is currently in bankruptcy court, trying to settle thousands of lawsuits brought against the company, filing for bankruptcy almost automatically puts all of those lawsuits against the company on hold. but crucial point. that doesn t stop the mounting pile of lawsuits against the family behind purdue pharma, which was enriched to multibillion dollar effect by the sales of oxycontin and that has taken billions of dollars out of the company as the company approached bankruptcy. so bankruptcy stops the lawsuits against the company but not against the family. except now tonight lawyers for purdue are asking the bankruptcy judge to also put on hold all the lawsuits against the sacklers personally, which is an effort to try to shield the family s wealth from these lawsuits. lawyers as of now are asking for an injunction against lawsuits against the sackler family personally because they say they are related parties to purdue in the overall bankruptcy case.
automatically putting all of those lawsuits against the company on hold. but crucial point. that doesn t stop the mounting pile of lawsuits against the family behind purdue pharma, which was enriched to multi billion dollar effect by the sales of oxycontin and that has taken billions of dollars out of the company as the company approached bankruptcy. so bankruptcy stops the lawsuits against the company but not against the family. except now tonight lawyers for purdue are asking the bankruptcy judge to also put on hold all the lawsuits against the sacklers personally which is an effort to try to shield the family wealth from these lawsuits. lawyers as of now are asking for an injunction against lawsuits against the sackler family personally because they say they are related parties to purdue in the overall bankruptcy case. this is a highly unusual move and suggests by filing for bankruptcy the sackler family is looking to protect themselves