That a businessman would have knowledge is limited in any when he is about to sign a transaction. But if you go after his integrity, right, if you go check. And by that he clearly meant after his public service, if you go after his military record, that President Trump was youre done. Thinking about or had in front but chuck, isnt there a high stakes problem with that, for of him the possibility of providing Security Assistance to trump and the republicans to say, because then the next question is, okay, who does know ukraine. It was similar to writing a check to someone who youre what trump said . Bolton and trump. About to send. He used that analogy very and they dont want those folks to come before congress. I absolutely agree. Im saying if there is a path to clearly to indicate that this try and point out that he has limited knowledge, thats the would be this would require path and its a narrow one. Something. If that person owed him does it ultimately work . No, it doesnt. Right.
we ve been encouraged to do. and i want to particularly note strategic partner, right? ukrainian national security four excerpts of the transcript. interests are our national one that relates to the security security interests. what s happening there matters a assistance we ve been talking lot to nato, to western europe, about. another that discusses a favor to eastern europe, to the future that president trump asks of of the atlantic alliance. president zelensky. a third where president trump it goes to the credibility of asks the ukrainian president to the united states of america. right. investigate his political standing up for the values that the united states of opponent, former vice president biden. america we thought stood for. and then a final one where the ukrainian president directly but i believe ambassador links the desired white house taylor and mr. kent made it very clear that we have significant visit to the political national security interests in investigation