Live Breaking News & Updates on Monica Lewinsky Affair|Page 2
Stay updated with breaking news from Monica lewinsky affair. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
We know this from a fame spreems court case. bill clinton against paula jones. and the supreme court said, yes, a private citizen can sue a sitting president for defamation. that case had major historical ramifications because that case led to the discovery of the monica lewinsky affair which led to perjury which led to impeachment. the supreme court draws an important distinction between a president s official and unofficial acts. you cannot sue a president for his official acts. he has immunity for that. if he does things in his personal capacity, including attacking people, potentially defaming them, then, yes, that can be the subject of a suit. i know what our viewers are thinking. if you can sue the sitting president, why can t you indict the sitting president? we have that doj policy. our viewers ask a lot about it. in the doj policy itself, they talk about the paula jones decision. criminal charges are different because in a criminal case you can end up with a president behind b ....
Saying he gets tired of the mendacity in his words, obviously, he has pro cured hundreds of thousands of followers and he seems to be in the spotlight for his views out there for world to see. have you as to remember, george conway was a key player in the bill checkpoint-monica lewinsky affair. you read. he has been a provocateur for 20 years, i mean, george canway, he s lesser known. but his wife to be sure in conservative circles has been a prominent player for some time. now he is probably at the apex of his fame talking about the president and writing parole 90ly and being in the middle of it all. he is receiveing a lot of attention, the number of twitter followers have grown expo exponential exponentially. this idea of george conway being jealous. ....
And hillary clinton. a year or so later after it was clear hillary was unlikely to run again, she broke with the clintons and said bill clinton should have resigned from office after the monica lewinsky affair affair. well, that angered rachel: that was in the midst of the #metoo. ed: so that angered the clinton camp obviously which brings to us chelsea clinton. look, if you want to question her credentials as a progressive you re out of your mind. chelsea clinton checks all the the boxes as robert wolf said last hour in terms of climate change. and yet you had these liberals activists accosting her pete: leftist tables. she s a liberal. they re leftist. absolutely. so remember what happened in new zealand, horrific attack, there was a vigil in support of the muslims that were killed there. chelsea shows up, and she is accosted. in fact she s told, she s the reason 49 people are dead. listen. after all that you have done. i m so sorry. ....
United states, a sitting president coming to testify before the congress on either side of the capitol, i just don t know any precedent for that and it would be highly unusual that he would use exactly what i just said as a bapti basis for not testifying. at some point that bust has to hit either a parking spot or a wall. he s going to be compel and testify some how some way and whether or not he knew anything about that. that s going to happen. not only bill clinton testified of the monica lewinsky affair. he s still testifying in a grand jury case more than 200 people indicted and more than 100 people convicted. that s a mystery for you nerds out there. ....
This sitting president is now in a position we saw in a sense bill clinton in. the bill clinton quest to get bill clinton started with whitewater started with a land deal way before he was president of the united states and the congress of the united states investigated that until they then led themselves to the monica lewinsky affair. in this case, donald trump by becoming president exposed his entire business life. the whole past even before he was president until he was in the oval office. why would he be immune from prosecution if he committed actual crimes financial crimes, insurance fraud, et cetera. doesn t that make him a super citizen who could have committed any crime he wanted as long as he remains president? two things. the doj position is based on analysis of the constitution. basically the idea is the president is the boss of all the prosecutors. he essentially would be prosecuting himself. ....