decade. the post office need to be removed as arbiter of the compensation schemes because the post office prosecute us, criminalises no we have to go cap in hand back to the post office to ask for recompense. and all convictions should be quashed because the inquiry has recently shown the behaviour of the post office, it is notjust behaviour of the post office, it is not just dodgy evidence behaviour of the post office, it is notjust dodgy evidence or dodgy it systems, it is the whole procedural approach to prosecutions, disclosure that i think leaves all of their convictions unsafe. that i think leaves all of their convictions unsafe. you sold your car, convictions unsafe. you sold your car. used convictions unsafe. you sold your car. used your convictions unsafe. you sold your car, used your savings, convictions unsafe. you sold your car, used your savings, your - convictions unsafe. you sold your i car, used your savings, your parents savings to make up a shortfall that was de
would do. i avoided smoking with guys named blake. wyndham s names like that because they have really long stories and horrible agendas that never go anywhere much lik this lawsuit. what would you rather have a drug that s too powerful or a drug not powerful enough. i would like one that is at the power and paranoid i m curious where is the shame? is like trying to get your mone back from a hooker. i wouldn t know. but it wasn t that great after all now that i think about it. i getting need some money back for that one young lady in you to use or yeah i ve been there. it s a dirty show after all. are we still on the air? i don t know peter you re big unaccountability, is there a