with making change? also, the debate over kink at pride. some say these events need to be more family-friendly, others say pride has to welcome absolutely everyone. the chairman of san francisco s leathermen s discussion group joins us live. and lgbtq history goes back a lot further than you might think. our producer brings us the latest research on people like alexander the great and william shakespeare. from nbc news in washington, i m joshua johnson, welcome to the week. . this week brought some big developments in the fight over voting rights. yesterday, the doj announced that it is suing the state of georgia over restrictive new voting laws passed there. this as the biden administration s first major move against numerous republican-supported laws. critics say they re designed to make it harder to vote. the lawsuit comes just days after democrats in congress failed to advance the for the people act. attorney general merrick garland called on congress to do more.
The chairman of San Franciscos leathermens Discussion Group joins us live. And Lgbtq History goes back a lot further than you might think. Our producer brings us the latest research on people like Alexander The Great and william shakespeare. From Nbc News in washington, im Joshua Johnson, welcome to The Week. This week brought some big developments in the fight over Voting Rights. Yesterday, the doj announced that it is suing the State Of Georgia over restrictive new Voting Laws passed there. This as the biden administrations first major move against numerous republicansupported laws. Critics say theyre designed to make it harder to vote. The lawsuit comes just days after democrats in congress failed to advance the for the people act. Attorney general Merrick Garland called on congress to do more. Our complaint alleges that recent changes to Georgias Election laws were enacted with the purpose of denying or abridging black georgians to vote on account of their race or color. We are usi
while he was there he shot thre people and killed two of them. the prosecution claims this was murder. he says it was self-defense. it s pretty simple. here s the amazing thing. every single witness the prosecution has called so far has wound up making the defendant s case for him. that witting healing about communists who would in house shots in the arm. he was supposed to be the prosecution s star witness in this, but once he got on the stand, he admitted that cal rittenhouse only shot him after he pointed a loaded gun in the boys face. watch. that s a photo of you, yes? yes. that is mister rittenhouse? correct. you degree your firearm is pointed at esther mike rittenhouse, correct? yes. once your firearm is pointed at esther mack rittenhouse, that s when you are fired at, correct? no. does it look like right now your arm is being shot? that looks like my bicep being vaporized, yes. and is it vaporized as you are pointing your gun directly at him? yes?
there he shot three people and killed two of them. the prosecution claims that thi was murder. carl rent house that it was self-defense. it s pretty simple. here s the amazing thing. every single witness the er prosecution has called so far has wound up making carl white house s for him. what include engaged crows the avowed communist who rittenhous shawn the arm. he was supposed to be the prosecution s star witness in this trial. once he got on the stand, he admitted that carl rittenhouse shot him after he pointed a loaded gun in the boys face. it s. that s a photo of you, yes? yes. okay. that s mr. rittenhouse? a correct beam act okay. now do you agree your firearm i appointed at mr. rittenhouse, correct? yes. once your firearm is pointed out mr. rittenhouse, that s whe he fired? no. sir, does it look like be me that looks like my shopping vaporized, yes.ze has been vaporized at the point and you re gun directly a him, yes? yes. y so when you were stan
solution is more censorship. i m pretty close to a first amendment absolutist. it is a check in the power of the state. it does not apply to private companies, like facebook or twitter. social media companies already make choices about what is or is not allowed on their platforms. the problem is we often don t know what principles govern those decisions. regulation has to be part of the answer. beyond that tech companies need to be more transparent about how they operate. so much of the conversation around disinformation is focused on what people post, the bigger issue is what content these platforms promote. kayleigh: or what they don t promote but instead sums are or do you remember this? i certainly do a bit of the new york post reporting about hunter biden s laptop. i was briefly banned for that, which multiple outlets later confirmed, including the liberal new york times. carley, when you think about president obama come on you think about president obama, kyler