didn t and why he believes or doesn t believe it. jillian: from what you heard yesterday i know there s a lot more to come and more we are going to learn but what you heard already. this is yesterday s hearing isn t going to change anybody s mind. if you believe the president was using irregular channels in order to dig up dirt on a political rival for personal gain that is what you believe. if you believe the president was hearing skeptical things about the ukrainians commitment looking into corruption and he s in title to set foreign-policy and send whatever advisors he wants to implement that policy and there s nothing wrong with that that is what you believe and i don t think anybody s mind was changed by what happened yesterday and i don t think anybody s mind will be changed at the end of next week. rob: let s listen to one more piece of sound from mister kent. i raised my concern to hunter biden s status as a board member would create a perception of a
day. it was a jungle on capitol hill yesterday. we will have much more. you are watching fox and friends first on thursday morning, thank you for starting or ending your day with us. we begin with the jungle, fox news alert, donald trump vowing to release his first call with ukraine today following the fire restart to public impeachment hearings. i don t know the identity of the whistleblower and i m determined to make sure the identity is protected. ambassador taylor and mister kent, i want to welcome you to russia hoax has ended and you have been cast in the low-rent ukrainian sql. tell you what i heard from people and in this case it was what i heard from ambassador sondland. where is the impeachable offense in a, shouted out can anyone.
first-hand witnesses. this was based on hearsay or conversation. two of the key ingredients that came out, one is mister kent did believe joe biden was involved in quid pro quo. the other key proponent of this is mister kent warned the previous administration about hunter biden saying there s potentially damaged improprieties that might come out of that and they ignore that at the time and kept it coming back full circle. on the issue with the bidens there s been talk about trying to subpoena them. the gop doing that to try to get them before a hearing and testimony but here are a number of headlines talking about that point, nbc news.com there is no evidence for trump s biden ukraine accusations, the new yorker the invention of the conspiracy theory on biden and ukraine. the intercept says a republican conspiracy theory about a biden and ukraine scandal has gone mainstream but it is not true. as for ideas that they would be able to subpoena the two of them
tired of this. nancy pelosi and adam schiff as well, he likes being in front of the camera know this has to be wrapped up. the longer this is drawn out, the more facts come to the surface it will be more damaging not just to the administrative side of things whoever the candidate might be but give the house a chance to win back for the republicans perspective. democrats today are celebrating the release of the latest transcript saying it makes their case. the joint statement from several top democrats saying the testimony of george kent strongly corroborates testimony from numerous other witnesses. mister kent affirms he and his colleagues recognize the impropriety of pressure ukrainian officials to undertake politically motivated investigations to help donald trump s for election prospect in 2020. we look forward to mister kent s public testimony. none of these folks were