know that it takes time after these raids to really analyze what you ve obtained to determine just how significant it is and to say so, so quickly seemed to me he was getting out way ahead of the evidence and it said to me this is an administration that is very defensive. they probably told sin come send us the video, we want to push it out there. we don t have time to vet it and they didn t and that was a mistake. i think what sean spicer needs to understand is every time he oversells or misstates or misrepresents, he loses a bit of his credibility he may never get back. and they are going to have a real problem on their hands. so, just to be precise, at least as of right now, you haven t seen any really significant intelligence information that emerged from this raid that will help the u.s. down the road in fighting al-qaeda? i m saying it s too early to tell. i think we simply don t know the length and breadth of what we have obtained in the raid. the raid that we did in syria s
$2,000 of coverage. you go into the emergency room and almost anything you have that s serious, stitches or something, will cost you $2,000. if you need surgery it wouldn t cover it. you have to put in and dish. excuse me. let me finish. i only have a limited time with you. i want the points in. we can have a back and forth on this. i get your point that some of the policies weren t good. you think they are now better. we have had people say, look, i liked my plan that wasn t that great, frankly, because i m in a place where i don t need maternity care. my wife isn t going to get preg nanne. i liked that plan and i feel president obama broke his promise to me. well, having a minimum floor that doesn t allow insurance companies to sell a plan that doesn t cover things and misrepresents them is important. that s not the fund membership tall part of the bill. the fundamental part of the bill is 34 million people will get
$50 or so a month for about $2,000 of coverage. you go into the emergency room and almost anything you have that s serious, stitches or something, will cost you $2,000. if you need surgery it wouldn t cover it. you have to put in and dish. excuse me. let me finish. i only have a limited time with you. i want the points in. we can have a back and forth on this. i get your point that some of the policies weren t good. you think they are now better. we have had people say, look, i liked my plan that wasn t that great, frankly, because i m in a place where i don t need maternity care. my wife isn t going to get preg nanne. i liked that plan and i feel president obama broke his promise to me. well, having a minimum floor that doesn t allow insurance companies to sell a plan that doesn t cover things and misrepresents them is important. that s not the fund membership tall part of the bill. the fundamental part of the bill is 34 million people will get
forces people to violate their religious beliefs. that misrepresents about the decision about the implementation. the decision was maid as we said in the past after very careful consideration. and the administration believes that this strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious beliefs and increasing access to important preventative services. it s important to go to your point that this approach does not signal any change at all in the administration s policy on conscience protections. the president and this administration have expressed strong support for conscience exemptions. also to healthcare providers. the administration has provided
religion. something that is much more charitable than i would say, personally. professor chance, do you think there could be an accurate portrayal through these books? i think most people would agree that it should portray the good, the bad and the ugly including religions that goes for christianity and islam and on that we agree. where we disagree, there is a fundamental imbalance in the textbooks today. this is a very odd resolution. i have been looking over the pertinent textbooks and this resolution really misrepresents what is actually in textbooks. it s based on textbooks that aren t even in use in texas schools any more. they have been replaced by different editions and misrepresents the editions that it does cite. i think that anyone who sat down and looked carefully at these textbooks and compared them to the resolution this misrepresents what is going on in texas schools. i do not think we re seeing