i think you have to look at the pattern and chronology. the russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. the russians gave help, and the president made full use of that help, and that isni pretty damn damning. last march, you said you had more than circumstantial evidence of treasonous collusion with russia. please be specific. if it s true, i believe americans have the right to know a year later what that is. i certainly said there is ample evidence of collusion. i ve never used of the word treason, only steve bannon used that word. if you look at the fax order in the public domain, they are pretty damning. the american people need to know if the russians have something they can hold over the president s head thehe united states. our work is not done. i can say with confidence that there is significant evidence of collusion between the campaign and russia. sean: collusion is not a crime. you are supposed to be a congressman.
the boomerang to the dnc launched against donald trump in his administration sean: obama said i could never happen! he would have to be no serious person would ever believe it until hillary lost. lets translate what we now know, sean. this is the ultimate information operations campaign. vladimir putin managed to place russian disinformation lies about a presidential candidate into the u.s. system through hillary clinton, through the dnc, into the justice system, so it actually landed in front of a fisa court judge. that is the normative what we are talking about. have 40 seconds,. michelle malkin. the worst part of all this isni that they knew from the beginning and the only person that give us russian lies in my campaign was hillary. hillary clinton, that s right.
frankly, when he discussed this with the president of mexico, there is a shared concern about drug cartels, drug trafficking, arms sales over the border. there is a shared concern for the respect of the border, because it means a lot to both sides. tucker: whatever you think of president trump s efforts, they may be supported by a majority of the public, a thin one, but a recent ap poll found a 52% of americans feel the risks outweigh the benefits and, arrival should be restricted accordingly. jorge ramos as an anchor for univision, he joins us tonight from miami, thanks for coming on. at an event several weeks ago in february, i want to ask you about it i m quoting you. i m a proud latino immigrant here in the united states. you know what exactly what isni going on here in the u.s. there are many people who do not want us to be here and want to create a wall in order to separate us. but you know what?
issues he s arguing, his attorney in the vegas case didn t tell him that he was offered a plea bargain in the case. i m very interested to know what yale is going to say because o.j. s not only saying my lawyer was horrible, but that he didn t tell me i could have pled out to a misni ninnin ninmeaisdemeanor. if yale says he s right, it could work. what lawyer would say that on the stand? it s not going to happen. and it s a fascinating back story here because galanter hired two local las vegas attorneys who really were the lead counsel in trying the case. and o.j. is now saying that galanter was sort of orchestrating the defense mind the scenes and galanter had a financial interest in o.j. not taking the witness stand, o.j. not taking a plea in the case. and he sort of told the local attorneys what to do.