contemporaneously with the president. he should not be allowed to edit or sanitize. mueller has to come before us. you are going to subpoena mueller? ed: let s go to chad pergram. tell us about that conference call nancy pelosi held. the special counsel is different than independent counseled ken starr in terms of transparency. they had a conference call this afternoon. and this conference call kind of served two masters. one, nancy pelosi was telling her democrats the investigation is not over. that s why she had six of the committee chairs broke various aspects of alleged misdoings. that s why she had the chairs on
compliance with financial disclosure requirements, trump s compliance with campaign finance laws, trump s compliance with tax laws, trump s potential and actual conflicts of interest, trump s business positively practices, trump s washington, d.c. hotel, trump s public statements and their accuracy. trump s foundations and potentially fraudulent practices. it goes on. we talked about how this is political and we ll see how this political process is playing out as democrats try to get answers and essentially make the president look bad, look corrupt in some way. and as the republicans try to cut down cohen s liability, what the president has done to take seriously a witness of the president s potential misdoings. i also think with cohen it s important to remember, as we see potentially a resolution or at least moving toward the mueller
a top donor agreed to paid cohen $10 million if he successfully pushed a project. sitting with questions of financial misdoings. forbes recently, man, what a report, that commerce secretary wilbur ross practices have sparked lawsuits and reimbursements and a fine from sec and tom price was also questioned about a favorable purchase of a stock at the time that was also at the center of collins arrest. price was fired amid scandals and former epa administrator scott pruitt talk about the swamp. it s now up to trump s neck. he, of course, intendinattended
guess i am reading it more for our viewers and listeners. this morning on twitter you wrote, it took all these years of whit perred accounts, months of determined reporting, dozens of women speaking out publicly and multiple jurisdictions investigating to get charges against harvey weinstein in connection to two women. even without a rich bully s army of protectors, the structural impediments to justice are staggering. what are those structural impediments? i was talking a little bit about the criminal structural impediments, including the fact that their burden of evidence is very high and it often vinvolve two individuals in a room. something may feel like a violation but not meet the standard of evidence for a crime. then there are also civil ways in which powerful people cover up for misdoings. and in the case of harvey weinstein, there s been great reporting about non-disclosure
always better, always 20/20 when you look back. but what this whole mueller investigation has turned into is a disgration. is a disgrace. when you look at the light of it all the seemingly multiple misdoings and perhaps criminal behavior from the hillary e-mail scandals using and transferring classified information to the false dossier paid for by both the clintons and the d.n.c. to the tarmac conversation, to spying on american citizens. i mean this thing goes deep. and it is something that the american people cannot stand about washington. the deep state. this is what we ve got to get to. harris: the president making news just moments ago when the so-called campaign spy, the intrill tater was brought up. if they have spies in my