Indicted, highly classified documents in bathroom and the ballroom down at maralago. And federal judge aileen cannon, the Trump Appointed lawyer who came to this case with only three years on the bench and with very little experience in running criminal trials. Cannon whose rulings in the case so far have repeatedly drawn scrutiny and reversals and rebukes by higher courts. And now judge cannon is under fire once again for what the Washington Post diplomatically calls, quote, an unusual order regarding jury instruction. Quote, even though cannon has not yet ruled when the trial will be held or a host of other issues, shes skipping ahead to the very end, to Jury Instructions, asking prosecutors and Defense Attorneys to consider two different hypothetical situations. Writing in part, quote, in the first scenario the jury would be allowed today review a former president s possession of a record and make a factual finding, whether it is personal or president ial, using the Definition Set f
groundwork is being laid for 2024 and beyond right in front of our very eyes today. take georgia, for example. after biden won there, the republican-controlled state legislator passed strict new election and voting laws. the republicans are now using those laws to take control of county election boards, pushing democratic members off the committee and replacing them with republicans. just last november georgia s republican secretary of state, brad raffensperger, refused to back down when trump pressured him to find 11,000 votes. now raffensperger faces a primary challenge from a trump-backed candidate. so, too, does georgia governor brian kemp. both of the trump-backed candidates, guess what? they re proponents of the big lie. all the repetition of the big lie from trump, maga media, elected republicans has only gone onto solidify the misbelief
side of intelligence committee said there is no proof that there was any kind of holding they up unless they helped with biden. he just suggested the same, did he not? he did and he is continuing to operate this apparent shadow foreign policy that the three amigos and he pursued they say it s all hearsay and speculation. they don t have an answer for why these people were never corrected in their misbelief in what was going on. it was apparently contagious in being discussed. why didn t they say you re all wrong except for this mystery phone call where the president used the same language that the whistle-blower did except the whistle-blower wasn t public yet. the white house knew about it and used quid pro quo, used it as well. what does that mean for you in the compelling nature of the case? the compelling nature of the case comes from the president s owns words, the president s own words in the phone call where the president of the united states is asked by the ukrainian pre
foreign policy that the three amigos and he pr suursued they say it s all hearsay and speculation. they don t have an answer for why these people were never corrected in their misbelief in what was going on. it was apparently contagious in being discussed. why didn t they say you re all wrong except for this miss try phone call where the president used the same language that the whistle-blower did except the whistle-blower wasn t public yet. the white house knew about it and used quid pro quo, used it as well. what does that mean for you in the compelling nature of the case? the compelling nature of the case comes from the president s owns words, the president s own words in the phone call where the president of the united states is asked by the ukrainian president in one portion, we need those anti-tank missiles. the next sentence virtually out of the president s mouth is, i
i think again it s just important that when the president goes off and says something or fails to say the right thing on behalf of the country, the congress step up and do their duty together. let s see what kevin mccarthy has said about this. . i do not see the leader of north korea as someone who is a friend. we know what happened to otto. we know what this country has done. i support the president and his effort to denuclearize them, but i do not have a misbelief of who this leader is. do you think you will have kevin mccarthy s vote on something that rebukes president trump? i hope so. it stands for what the united states believes in. say what you want about president trump. we need to speak for america. this will really be historic in so many ways. first of all it s just beyond belief that the congress has to make this statement in reaction to a president saying this.