Stay updated with breaking news from Military stuff. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
What we can do here? i personally think it does it divides a into risk levels and what s interesting is that at the highest risk level it is not just stuff like medical data and military stuff, it s also talking about the truth. are people using it to manipulate public opinion, and that s an unacceptable risk level and that would be banned. that sort of thing is a big deal. i will say the eu is specifically not included in the list of 180 countries where google is barred, the answer to chatgpt is being released. the eu is not on the list. the fact that google recognizes we are not going to be entirely in compliance with the gdpr, it means that these companies don t like to make different products for different countries. so maybe the fact that the eu is moving forward on this could conceivably set a law on this. i will also point out, we talk about it a lot, we hear from tech leaders, we are going to fall behind china if we somehow regulate ourselves out of competitiveness. but even ....
Commitment of democracy with the people of ukraine, they are standing up to russian aggression and russian atrocities. they are assuming russian military, they are industrial base cannot keep up with the pace with which they are losses i don t think either the russian people will be able to continue to support the loss of lives there occurring there. but if china stepped in, obviously with chinese weapons showing up on the battlefield, that would be a game changer for european allies and russia would be the aggressor in europe. that would change the whole perception of china. steve: essentially, congressman, the last couple of days, russia and china have been circling the wagons. because we have tried to put as many onerous sanctions on russia to get them to get the hell out of ukraine and of course that is not working right now. and the military stuff, russia and china now have a deal where china will buy as much of the oil they can possibly pump to ....
Putin. he s put his prestige a little on the line with his no limits agreement of just over a year ago. i don t think the chinese mind the u.s. readiness is being diminished. so much of our military stocks are going to ukraine, so they, therefore, wouldn t be available if there ever were a taiwan conflict. but i think china would prefer not to cross lines and not to become the target of a new u.s./european campaign. my view is they ll do as much as they have to but not more. they don t need russia to win. they simply don t want putin to be humiliated and the united states and their allies to have a major victory. they re buying oil. they re shipping dual-use equipment, and they ll probably, one way or another, give military stuff if they have to. they re not looking to make ukraine the centerpiece of u.s.-china relations. their focus is on their part of the world. again, taiwan, one good piece of news there, just to say, i thought it was interesting the new speaker decided he wouldn t ....
Political system by showing everybody else that belligerence in fact works. so now is not the time to talk to china. i know it sounds like we always should, but we ve done that for decades and it s produced horrible results. we should be trying something new. neil: thanks, gordon. we ll see what happens. this whole drama really unfolds once the chinese balloon made its way over temperature continental united states and particularly over the state of montana. it was surveilling a lot of top secret government military stuff that we have. didn t that state senator, john tester know it and worry about start screaming about it. a bipartisan warning from montana s senator who is up next. we re investing for our clients in the projects that power our economy. from the plains to the coasts, ....
With the chinese communist party. john: i mean, let s get you to speak to the sputnik moment and the difference between the cold war back then and china, we were not getting most of our stuff made in russia back then. right, yeah, certainly, and this is different than the cold war, for sure different. because of all these military moves i ve been talking about on both sides, we are closer to a hot war than we have ever been, and i don t think it s a sputnik moment. we need to make sure it s not a sputnik moment. we need to work on improving american national security interests and protecting our economic interests and that means let s deescalate the situation and start more diplomacy and not always talk about the military stuff. that does not work to our advantage, it does not help us. gillian: interesting to hear you say that, colonel. we don t get that a lot from our military experts. i want us to be improved and help us, not just show we are tough or whatever. that doesn t h ....