Careless naming of inventors on a patent application can create confusion and add complexity to an already intricate process. The recent case of Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Prod., Inc. is a great example where failure to properly list a co-inventor resulted in the only named inventor losing their patent rights.
Objective Evidence in Determining Obviousness - In Medtronic, Inc. v. Teleflex Innovations, Appeal No. 21-2357, the Federal Circuit held that a close prima facie case of.
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling to correct inventorship on hose patents after plaintiff proved the patent holder had gotten ideas for his invention after the two met. Blue Gentian LLC v Tristar Products Inc.
Inventorship Hosed Clean: Contribution, Corroboration and Collaboration Prove Joint Invention | McDermott Will & Emery jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
BLUE GENTIAN, LLC v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC - Before Prost, Chen, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. - .