Stay updated with breaking news from Mexican chamber. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
So 10 in that two way poll. The polls confirm it, who is best for the economy. Trump beats clinton, 5144. More in a moment. Hillary in trouble. Back on the trail with a limited schedule. Again, playing defense on scandal and the backlash to her deplorable comment wont go away. Late polls show her trailing in ohio, florida, nevada, arkansas. This morning, television and social media are just full of jimmy fallon musing up Donald Trumps hair and the Clinton Campaign, i call it desperate. Trying to bring up the Birther Movement. Varney company is about to begin. You say shocking things. I cant believe, but im trying not to. Can i mess your hair up . The answer is yes, the people in New Hampshire where im going to be an hour from now, i hope they understand. Go ahead. ....
We showed it today to introduce you to cspan cities tour. For five years, we have traveled to cities across the u. S. To explore their literary and historic sites. You can watch more of our visit that cspan. Org cities tour. That is grand rapids. And the grand river which divides the city. And in many ways, defines the city. There is a good chance that most people over the course of any given day will see or interact with a piece of french are made in grand rapids. We were the first city to ever receive a grant from the endowment to be used specifically to commission an original work of art for a civic site. This weekend, the cspan cities tour will explore the literary life and history of red rapids, michigan. That is on book tv on cspan2. The author of the book, thin ice will talk about that the book people who grew up in grand methods grand rapids. Then we will hear how Richard Smith works and his newest biography on gerald for. ....
Relevant. I think it is relevant. I think thats really consistent with what the District Court judge did hear here. Of course you give deference to the statements of those experts. The question she asked, have they given me a logical and plausible reason, is the same thing this court has done in other cases. It was a camel case under foia, where the affidavit did not properly establish why something was classified. What the District Court judge here did, and set on the factual record, was it doesnt make sense. I want to go back to judge williams question. Why is it the pressenterprise standard . Shouldnt we just say it is properly classified . The standard for classification at the lowest level, basically just says if there is a reasonable expectation that some harm could happen. Damage to National Security, but just ....