should prove its innovation and for this reason we re proposing the by the end of the year creation of european defense fund to actively stimulate research and innovation in this area. the lisbon treaty allows member-states to, who wish to do so to make the capacity a further structure and high time to a veil ourselves of this ability. [applause] president, the final point which i wish to touch upon has to do with our collective responsibility and i m calling on all of the european institutions and each of the member-states to assume more responsibility. we need to do away with old spats where which could lead to failure because we can not survive without working together. europe needs to be better explained and i ve asked the commissioners over the coming weeks to visit national parliaments in order to discuss the european union and the commissioners have gone to national parliaments more than 350 times and i would like for them to do that more now. europe can only be built
he and other p.o.w.s used to communicate. every night they tapped out goodnight and god bless america from their cells to each other. when you knew the man in the cell next to you was down and hurting his feet locked and ankle cuffs at the foot of the concrete slab come his hands cuffed tightly behind him, he had been like that for a week or a month, you get up to your wall frequently and you tapped to him gb and he knew that meant god bless. he knew that it also meant to be tough, hang in there. i am praying for you. and then in a week or a month or whenever he d be up on his wall to encourage you in the same way for example on the p.o.w. flag, never forget, never forget. never forget. we all came out of that prison experience as stronger men. in some ways it was like cramming a doctorate degree into those years in prison. i would like to leave you this morning with a p.o.w. message. at the end of every day we would sign off and say goodnight. g anne for goodnight. gba. go
but some things have come they are looking for opportunities to see that the decisions taken by the administration reflect for example on the credit rating which is something very important. it is not something that suddenly they have been there administration but we believe the decision may be in the financial institution that you have the responsibility. of course were looking for in a more cooperation with the private sector and again the administration is important. but we are working more specifically in certain areas. were incorporating the second objective which i described. it is strong, it s a strong cooperation between the security institutions, we found that our security system was quite dismantled so we are seeking support on the building come on equipment, so we are working on things in that regard and were also working very closely and coordinating with peacekeeping, private change in things that are of importance to us but also to the us. we also have have a fe
relevant. i think it is relevant. i think that s really consistent with what the district court judge did hear here. of course you give deference to the statements of those experts. the question she asked, have they given me a logical and plausible reason, is the same thing this court has done in other cases. it was a camel case under foia, where the affidavit did not properly establish why something was classified. what the district court judge here did, and set on the factual record, was it doesn t make sense. i want to go back to judge williams question. why is it the press-enterprise standard? shouldn t we just say it is properly classified? the standard for classification at the lowest level, basically just says if there is a reasonable expectation that some harm could happen. damage to national security, but just some reasonable expectation of some sort of harm. it s almost an invitation to speculate. what the first amendment requires is more than that. that s wh
you are the experts. what do you suggest we do about that? do we just sit back and let that happen? itt you know, we proposed earlier this year some projects for cost in the i m medicare program so we are making char thinking of of total cost of care that all the folks are thinking of the total cost is thinking about the quality and the quantity. i will not get into what we are or not doing with the pharmaceutical cost that is outside the framework. but certainly. would you like gcs do something about it? to make absolutely especially specialty pharmaceuticals have a significant increase. as we look at the market it is something we have to address but also at affordable health care and i can tell you someone i have seen increased premiums with higher deductibles and less benefits than when i was purchasing in the private sector. that will go to the gentleman from alabama. so far there are others that are coming down the pipeline we have heard the clip to say if yo