deby has been killed while visiting soldiers on the frontlines debbie had just won reelection and was one of africa s longest serving leaders his son general mammas cock was expected to be interim head of state the army has now implemented a curfew and shut borders and it says democratic elections will take place following a transition period have a morgan has more from charles katz on. president himself went to the frontlines along with top army officials to lead the battle against the group announced later that at least $300.00 were killed and more than $140.00 were captured while the rest fled and were being pursued by the government military now we hadn t heard from. all over the weekend we didn t hear from him yesterday as well on the day that the national electoral commission announced that he had won the election by nearly 80 percent we were expecting to hear a statement from him. to assure his supporters and to basically welcome the results of the national electoral c
. . . . . . . . . . . . we know that from the kilo case where justice scalia said when cutting-edge technology is used in that case to invade the privacy of the home then a warrant was presumptively required and the jones case suggested that even outside the home you might have an expectation of privacy against cutting-edge technology. in the end, the government is limited in its ability to record our conversations in public by state and federal laws, but the expectation of privacy test would have protected you against the laser beam. james, welcome to landmark cases. you re on. hi. when justice stewart delivered the opinion in court he took issue with the way the petitioner act tomorrow lated the questions which included a, whether a public telephone booth was a publicly protected area and physical penetration was necessary before search and seizure could be said were violations to the fourth amendment to the un
c-span3. all persons having persons before the honorable, supreme court of the united states who admonish to draw near and give their attention. landmark cases, c-span special history series produced in partnership with the national constitution center exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic supreme court decisions. mr. chief justice may it please the court. quite often in many of the most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. let s go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in a rule of law. good evening and welcome to c-span landmark cases. tonight s case is katz versus the united states, it is a 1967 case and the person who gave his name to the case is somewhat of an unlikely hero. he was a bookmaker specializing in college basketball games and he took his wiretapping c
national conversation through c-span s daily program or through our social media feeds. c-span created by america s cable television companies as a public service and brought to you today by your television provider. all persons having business before the honorable supreme court of the united states are admonished to draw near and give their attention. landmark cases, c-span s special history series produced in partnership with the national constitution center. exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic supreme court decisions. mr. chief justice and may it please the court. quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. let s go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in a rule of law. good evening and welcome to c-span landmark cases. tonight s case is
having business before the supreme court will want to draw near and give their attention. announcer: landmark cases, c-span s special history series. exploring the human story and constitutional dramas behind 12 supreme court decisions. quite often, in our famous decisions, the supreme court was unpopular. let s go through a few cases that illustrate what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in the believe in the rule of law. tonight s case is katz v. united states. it is a 1967 case. charles katz was an unlikely hero. he took his wiretapping case to the supreme court and in a seven to one decision expanded our privacy rights. we will begin by listening to justice samuel alito in his constitution hearings where he talked about the importance of the kats case. i was talking about cats versus the united states this morning in relation to wiretapping. you had to look into property law in the interest of