Live Breaking News & Updates on Mens Journal|Page 5
Stay updated with breaking news from Mens journal. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
It can t be used against you. so you you don t have any exposure so you must talk. i want to show our viewers the publications. national enquirer, men s journal, us weekly, lots of them. only one that i really want to be on the cover of is muscle and fitness, but they haven t approached me. but here is my point. david pecker runs a media empire. do media people not have some things that they can stand behind when the law comes after you by saying we ve got the fifth amendment, i have a right to be friends with whomever i wish to, i have the right to write whatever i want, and if i wanted to buy a story about karen mcdougal and not publish it, you have a right protected by the constitution? what could possibly pressure david pecker into making a deal with the feds? well, they do and is this going to be i think an interesting collateral part of ....
Did we learn anything from hearing it? some day maybe we will find out from prosecutors if this is legally relevant. i want to posit, if you like me, are skeptical why this tape between trump and cohen merit so much attention. i think there is one known reason why this thing is interesting. i say this as a skeptic on this story in general. there s one thing here that grabs me. we have known that the publisher, who paid this woman, karen mcdougal $150,000 for the story and killed the story, didn t run it. they publish the supermarket tabloid and enquirer and men s journal and other names you have heard of. we have known that company, american media got a federal subpoena at some point this spring in new york. today, wall street journal today was the first to report american media s subpoena arrived on the exact same day ....
Whether or not this was an actual publishing contract rather than political expenditure to help donald trump win an election. after seeing in the wall street journal about the timing of the subpoena, we asked american media and they directed us to the original statement from april about the settlement and cover date from men s journal, otherwise we got nothing new from them at all. i have one big question and a half here. is american media potentially in legal trouble here? if they are trying to make it look like they were doing something as a publishing company under their own first amendment rights it was just a business decision for them as a publisher, even their own employees don t believe that and believe they are backtracking trying to cover up what was actually a political act and an expensive one by that company, are they in legal trouble for that? the reason i care about that. there is the possibility legal trouble and entities close to the president could ultimately ....
The original statement from april about the settlement and cover date from men s journal, otherwise we got nothing new from them at all. i have one big question and a half here. is american media potentially in legal trouble here? if they are trying to make it look like they were doing something as a publishing company under their own first amendment rights it was just a business decision for them as a publisher, even their own employees don t believe that and even their own employees believe that they are backtracking and trying to cover up what was actually a political act and an expensive one by that company, are they in legal trouble for that in the reason i care about that is that there is the possibility that legal trouble for people and entities close to the president that could ultimately become legal trouble for the president if in fact that legal trouble is so worrying that those entities and those people consider flipping and cooperating with prosecutors for any other larger ....