In the interpretation of law. Mr. William jz palts rely on [inaudible] of 2008. Casehe is also citing a 4th circuit case, but the Plan Department distinguish that cosbecause it is a [inaudible] and not categorical exemption. I wonder why you think in some ways the law that mr. Williams is citing is distinshuishable from the facts of this fire house im here to advice the board on the Legal Standard of review. I havent looked at the ken berryit is not a court case, it is a Regional Water Quality Control board decision that is not binding precedent for this bod and not legal precedent. It wont provided to me before i walked into this hearing so i dont feel i can common on that, but qu talk about the case law on isissue. The shourt version is there no direct case law on point on isissue. There are a couple cases that touch around the issue around the edges, but neither is on point. One is the parker decision that i believe it is parker shaddock neighborhood b berkeley city counsel. But tha