eyebrows yesterday with the president s answer to this question. watch this. my desire to increase the u.s. manufacturing and jobs in america is not about china. i m not concerned about china. martha: can that, we break in kayleigh mcenany , co host of outnumbered and marc thiessen is with us, fox news contributor and juan williams, senior political analyst for fox news. we start with kayleigh mcenany . great to have you with us. from the press perspective, one thing that got attention about this particular answer is the president had a card in his hand with a picture of the reporter and the question essentially, more or less, that she was going to ask and a list with all of the numbers. we ve gone so far from this sort of open back and forth with the president. is this normal, to lay these questions out this way? not that level of detail. look, i had a reporter from a wire service and good reporter that was being diligent trying to get information for the american pe
topic during hours of intense questioning. dana and bill. dana: thank you, david spunt. republicans have long enjoyed an advantage in the electoral college. believe me. because of past luck in key battleground states that decide the election. in 2016 he won the presidency even though he lost the popular vote. that edge is now fading. we want to talk about that, of course. let s start with that and we ll go to impeachment and everything else on our plate today. so democrats have been so frustrated how is it that we can win so much more in the popular vote and still lose the presidency? happened in 2000 and happened again if 2016. new york times in arguing the republicans, because they are growing in red areas but shrinking in blue areas, this is changing. do you see that? i agree. there is a migration of our party. we have red voters moving to red states. florida and texas have added and blue and purple states are getting bluer and why i ve made the case electorally we h
headquarters in new york, a lot of big stories today, including a stunning warning that stopped us in our tracks from the fbi director about what he saysed is an across-the-board rising terrorist threat level here in the united states. i see blinking lights everywhere i turn. martha: we ll hear more about that. he will we ll get more of what he said and explain what he s talking about there. it was stunning. first, a huge story to continue to tackle today. in recent years we have covered what many see on u.s. campuses as the deterioration of education, an active open scholarlish debate that were the foundation of these once great institutions. while that was happening, these universities spend a lot of time and effort of memo sending to champion safe spaces and zero tolerance for everything from trans rights to offensive dining like tacos. after having protected so many groups, it looks like there s a glaring hole in the policy. it doesn t appear to extend to jews post
A woman, charlie. the problem is there s so many incredible female athletes that should be celebrated that worked so hard. during woman s time, we re celebrating a biological man, leah thomas. it s not right. leah thomas calling women trans phobic. i feel like we ve gotten to the point that if we re labelled as tran foe business for standing up for our rights i m a former athlete myself. i can t imagine being in a situation that riley gaines found herself in, how i would have felt. it s gotten to the point where these words like trans phobic, it s why are we giving so makeup power to them? if standing up for women makes me trans phobic, it means nothing to me. martha: because it puts it in a box. this woman who is an athlete is against trans people, but it seems to me they re standing up for fairness. they re saying i want to be on a fair playing field. right? literally. what we re seeing is some