Hunter and james biden recently. But our story is not about them tonight, as shocking as some of the details are. The story were about to tell you is about joe biden, the man who days from now could be elected president of the United States. Joe biden, and we can tell you this with certainity, has direct personal involvement with his familys Business Dealings in Communist China and likely in other countries as well. The former Vice President of course has vehemently denied that. He is lying. Tonight we can prove that. Before we begin, a word about Tony Bobulinski. Bobulinski is not a conventional whistleblower. He has no political agenda, to the extent he supported candidates in the past, hes given exclusively to democrats. Nor is he seeking money from this story, this is not a shakedown of the buy dense or anyone else. Bobulinski is already rich, significantly rich. He is a significant figure in american finance. And thats exactly why the biden family sought him out in the first place
steve: thank you very much, todd. 6:00 a.m. on the east coast. last day of dry january, januar. it s been a long month, folks. welcome to fox & friends. fox news alert. overnight, impeachment tar heels against dhs secretary mayorkas have moved ahead in the house. carley: as cities reel from the border crisis, lawrence is in denver and spoke exclusively with the democrat mayor there. every hotel room we have in the city of denver is full. we are at 5,000 people in shelter and we have more coming every day. i think our city is very close to its breaking point now. brian: an 11-year-old is safe this morning after terrifying footage shows her escaping an attempted kidnapper. look at this. fox & friends starts right now. and, remember, your mornings are better because you have chosen to be with friends, meaning us. watch. all right a fox news alert on this wednesday morning. the house homeland security committee yesterday advanced articles of impeachment against
al sand alexandria hoff with the latestest on all of this. reporter: so the president tried to the use the 2003 heroes act as a route to usher in this loan forgiveness plan. of course, the supreme court shot that down yesterday. now biden administration is looking at something called the higher education act as a means to the become a plan b. we re not going to waste any time on this. we re getting moving on it it s going to take longer, but we re getting at it right away. reporter: president sd the higher education act will allow the secretary the of education to waive or release are loans under certain circumstances. very few details on how or why this route could work, and it s likely to face the the same legal challenges. as part of a joint statement released yesterday, republican senator bill cassidy wrote, quote: president biden s sunt loan scheme is still illegal and does not forgive department, but with instead ares it to to those who willingly took on the d
designed to create diverse student bodies at our countries colleges and universities. we re going to talk about why that ruling is so much better than just a college admission process. plus, the conservative-leaning court also presided president biden s debt forgiveness plan was unlawful, which means payments will default again soon. we are talking to biden s domestic policy chief about what the president can do to still give americans some form of relief for their student loan debt and much more. and when it comes to this idea of color blindness the conservatives want you to believe is their way of not seeing race as a factor in legislation or policymaking. well, i say they are lying. i ll explain why later this hour. i am symone sanders-townsend, folks, live from new orleans, today. hey essence. and i have got something to say. elections have consequences, and supreme court rulings have ramifications. millions of americans will soon feel the consequences of this n
ju julie banderas , dr. janet nesheiwat and ian prior. we begin with shannon bream, who is live at the supreme court. shannon. shannon: kayleigh, we had talked about student loans and issue was standing, state of missouri had standing to bring this legal challenge and secretary of education went too far using the heroes act to wipe out student loans. the 6-3 opinion, the heroes act gives authority to cancel money for student loans, it does not. the secretary can modify regulatory provision, with the education acts, not to rewrite the statute from the ground up, which is essentially what he did to wipe out the loans. the judge wrote this, the statute read gives secretary broad authority to remove national emergency effect on ability to repay student loan. that 6-3 split did not see this the same way. this affects billions in student loans. the president and other democrats suggested, i don t think he had authority to do this and supreme court agreed. lori smiths, free speech