Time for it to happen and causes the maximum disruption. ibt; time for it to happen and causes the maximum disruption. by mid-afternoon esterda , maximum disruption. by mid-afternoon yesterday. the maximum disruption. by mid-afternoon yesterday, the issue maximum disruption. by mid-afternoon yesterday, the issue had maximum disruption. by mid-afternoon yesterday, the issue had been - maximum disruption. by mid-afternoon yesterday, the issue had been fixed - yesterday, the issue had been fixed but the knock on impact continues. airlines are grappling with aircraft and crews being out of position and some staff being over ours. some passengers face a long wait to get home. we passengers face a long wait to get home. ~ , . passengers face a long wait to get home. . , ., , ., home. we stayed in paris for the nitht, as home. we stayed in paris for the night. as you home. we stayed in paris for the night. as you can home. we stayed in paris for the night, as you can see. home. w
Bit of the 1985 meeting with reagan and gorbachev. that got on well. is there any way you see these two very like minded leaders seeing something in each other that will benefit these tensions and decrease tensions? or are we still in an era of maximum disruption? i think you can say some potential benefit. we are talking about the countries of the two largest nuclear arsenals of the world pointed at each other. there is some interest of mankind to have relationship there. with the reagan/gorbachev parallel. reagan went in with the reputation of being a happy warrior. cold warrior. no one more hawkish on russia than reagan.