Okay. We are on brown. Good afternoon, well call this meeting back to order. The Historic Preservation. City clerk good afternoon. We are back in order. Please silence all cell phones and when speaking please speak directly into microphone and please state your name for the record. We are on item 9. Item 9 brown 4155 57590744 landmark designation work Program Informational presentation regarding three recent communityinitiated nominations for landmark designation pursuant to article 10 of the planning code. This informational item was calendared at the hpcs request following Public Comment at its regularly scheduled hearing on june 18, 2014 in support of article 10 designation of 182198 gough street, the r. L. Goldberg building. This item also includes information pertaining to two Additional Properties recently nominated by the community for article 10 landmark designation. Sf 91234 good afternoon, commissioners, mary Brand Department staff. Im here to discuss issues nominated, 182, 1
The exhibition of queenian. It replaces the familys earlier farm house moved to the dairy in the 1970s. The was located in an area. The building was included in several recent Historic Buildings and 1986 architectural is survey. Early july a nearby resident requested the building be designated as a local landmark and provided its history with association with the family. Based on the review the building may qualify which appears architecturally significant. The building may also qualify due to its association with the pioneering language lang and connected. This morning i received a letter of support for designation from a member of the public. In the case report are several options for the hpc to consider including add anything or all of the properties to the landmark designation program. Requesting more information from project applicants and directing staff to prioritize any or all of these properties over all the properties on the work program. This concludes my presentation and im
The exhibition of queenian. It replaces the familys earlier farm house moved to the dairy in the 1970s. The was located in an area. The building was included in several recent Historic Buildings and 1986 architectural is survey. Early july a nearby resident requested the building be designated as a local landmark and provided its history with association with the family. Based on the review the building may qualify which appears architecturally significant. The building may also qualify due to its association with the pioneering language lang and connected. This morning i received a letter of support for designation from a member of the public. In the case report are several options for the hpc to consider including add anything or all of the properties to the landmark designation program. Requesting more information from project applicants and directing staff to prioritize any or all of these properties over all the properties on the work program. This concludes my presentation and im
You want to see more solidity there . I would like to see more solidity. I would like it to feel as part of the building and not the lattice fence that you buy from home depot. Landscaping too. Okay. Thank you. Okay. If there is no further comments do i have a motion. I will make a motion with conditions that staff has written. Second. Thank you. There is a motion and second to the project with conditions. On that motion, commissioner highland, commissioner jang, yes, commissioner i dont know, commissioner matsuda, commissioner wilson . Yes. That motion passes 70. Commissioner that places you on item 9. Lets do a five 5minute okay. We are on brown. Good afternoon, well call this meeting back to order. The Historic Preservation. City clerk good afternoon. We are back in order. Please silence all cell phones and when speaking please speak directly into microphone and please state your name for the record. We are on item 9. Item 9 brown 4155 57590744 landmark designation work Program Info
I would like to commend you for the project. It has gone forward with leaps and bounds and much improved. My one comment was i would prefer the handrail extensions maybe simplified. I think that was a staff comment but wasnt in the draft notion. That was my recommendation to define those elements. Otherwise its successful. Commissioner pearlman . I would like to talk about the windows because i knows those are the really right things to do. I also wanted to say that i actually really like the door setback better than where it is set forward because it actually gives some real presence to that entrance that it doesnt have now and stairs in front of it, thats a very significant positive change from before. The only comment i had was the plexiglass relates to the glass, the vertical pictures which are pickets on your balcony seem to go with the building and this doesnt both me. The final design is up to you and the conversation you have with the department. My only design comment is the b