The speaker pro tempore for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition . Mr. Speaker, i move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill, h. R. 5322, the ensuring diversity in Community Banking act, as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 5322, a bill to establish or modify requirements relating to Minority Depository Institutions, Community Development Financial Institutions, and impact banks and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Sherman, and the gentleman from sk, mr. Timmons, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Sherman. Mr. Sherman mr. Speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks on this legislation, and to insert extraneous material thereon. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Sherman i yi
Is if if the president of the United States continues to call in aides and instruct them or give them leave to go out and make comments and starts exciting inconsistent with what the policy is of the administration or changing it, i think that the general is going to have to do this hes going to have to tell the president , look, mr. President , if youre going to tweet, let us know beforehand and let us take a look at it, if you will, and also folks coming into your office, when they come out of your office, if you call them in, instruct them that they will have to come by me and inform me whats been said, and hes going to have to structure this thing. I dont know whether thats going to work, but i do know that those below the general, given what he did today, i think will have gotten the message, and i think hes certainly got the possibility of imposing a new sense of discipline and order on the staff below him but were dealing with the president of the United States i mean, thats one
Enough. Acts signed by gerald ford. The American People said enough is enough. Actually, the presidency has gotten too powerful by making use of vague areas in the constitution. This debate may not have been necessary for the impeachment but it was a critical element in the changing thinking of americans about what to expect from their president. Tim naftali who is with nyu and was the director of the nixon president ial Library Director joining us from new york. Thank you for adding your voice and perspective to the debate we are about to show our audience. Well take you back to july 29, 1974, the house judiciary committee. For the next three hours, the evening debate over article ii of impeachment of Richard Nixon. The committee was debating the wiggins motion and those in opposition to the amendment have consumed eight minutes. Those in support of the amendment have consumed five minutes. I now recognize the gentleman from california. I yield five minutes of my time to the gentleman
Think miss herrick was making any additional determinations beyond what she had initially recommended, and that we had earlierly decided on october 22nd. I think she simply is enforcing that view and decision by redacting the portions that were by our prior determination. So that is my understanding of what happened here. Okay. And that it was privileged as part of the Ethics Commission investigation or as part of the controllers investigation . Well, i think we mr. Givner, correct me if im wrong, i think we determined that both are. I think these emails may have been as part of our file, the commissions file. But it relates to both. Okay. Thank you. Commissioner hayon . My question is in terms of the opinion that has been rentered by miss herrick, are we bound by that dismissing or is it simply advisory and we can decide what we think . We are not bound by her memo. We made our decisions at the october 22nd meeting. And as part of that, we asked her to review some additional documents
Im turning into mr. Chatfield my 150word testimony that i will remail so you dont have to rekey it, introducing typos. Im sorry, can you hand me that copy back . Never mind, i found what i was looking for. So you will recall that when i was here, in october, i testified that 1040 doesnt apply and i also testified quite strongly, both here and at the Sunshine Task force that c369913 doesnt apply either. I have been denied access to these records for two years. Regarding access to litigation states, advice and compliance with, analysis of, and opinion concerning liability under or any communication otherwise concerning the California Public records act the ralph m. Brown act, political reform act and San Francisco ethics code or this ordinance, are pay atection to this, are Public Records. Subject to disclosure. Notably, section 6253c of sippra gives agencies ten days to notify requesters, whether the requested records are exempt or disclosable and that if an agency fails to notify the r