leadership mandate, they said, and it was time to move forward. i think it s a convincing result, a decisive forward. i think it s a convincing result, a decisive result, - forward. i think it s a convincing result, a decisive result, and i forward. i think it s a convincing i result, a decisive result, and what it means is that as a government we can move on and focus on the stuff that i think really matters. as the votes were cast at westminster this evening, and after the result, the rebels said that things had now changed fundamentally. i hadn t expected more than a third of the i hadn t expected more than a third of the parliamentary party expressing no confidence in the prime expressing no confidence in the prime minister, but it is severely damaging prime minister, but it is severely damaging for him and his reputation. we will damaging for him and his reputation. we will have the latest from westminster tonight, from downing street, on what the result means f
Misjudgments of leadership. there can be few colleagues on the side of the house who are truly enjoying being members of parliament at the moment. it is utterly depressing to be asked to defend the indefensible. but others defended the prime minister. i but others defended the prime minister. ., . ,, ., minister. i acknowledge the seriousness minister. i acknowledge the seriousness of minister. i acknowledge the seriousness of how - minister. i acknowledge the seriousness of how big - minister. i acknowledge the seriousness of how big a . minister. i acknowledge the - seriousness of how big a mistake he made seriousness of how big a mistake he made and seriousness of how big a mistake he made. and of course, he should apologise made. and of course, he should apologise for it and take responsibility. and accept the verdict responsibility. and accept the verdict of the police were there and he was verdict of the police were there and he was surprised by that verdict or not.
Adequately test mrjohnson s conclusion? the prime minister sees it this way. i’m conclusion? the prime minister sees it this way - it this way. i m very keen for every possible it this way. i m very keen for every possible form it this way. i m very keen for every possible form of- it this way. i m very keen for| every possible form of scrutiny it this way. i m very keen for i every possible form of scrutiny and of the house can do whatever it wants to do for the all i would say is i don t think that should happen until the investigation is completed. until the investigation is completed. until the investigation is comleted. ., completed. the police are continuing their work. there completed. the police are continuing their work. there is completed. the police are continuing their work. there is senior completed. the police are continuing their work. there is senior civil i their work. there is senior civil servants are great, she is investigating 16 gathering. but the po
Cells. boris johnson has received one fined for breaking his own i one fined for breaking his own covid i9 regulations but there may be more to come. however, we will not find out for a while because the metropolitan police says it will not be issuing any updates on their investigation into the parties at downing street into the local elections have taken place across the uk next month. in westminster, an extraordinary day in the house of commons in many ways and potentially a very significant one for the future boris johnson. yes, it is definitely significant. if borisjohnson coming to be investigated by the privileges committee of whether or not he misled the house of commons and whether specifically he deliberately misled the house of commons because there is a the way commons works is there is a the way commons works is there are some conventions, some agreements. mps are not allowed to accuse each other of lying in the house of commons, usually. another is if the minister misleads