Commission. And, so, what i would think is probably a better thing to do is allow for the same kind of language so that if the department actually exceeds what the Health Policies or the Health Commissions policy is on contingency, then they have to go back for approval. If the Health Department or the Health Commission policy should change to 10 considertion, then it should be at 10 level. So, i want to make sure we allow for the Health Commission to exercise sort of their jurisdiction over the Health Departments policy on contingency before we sort of say a different level. Madam chair and supervisor avalos, we concur with what the chair just stated. That seems reasonable. Okay, thank you. Do we have that motion . Moved. We have a motion to accept the budget analysts first recommendation and then to amend the budget analysts second recommendation so that it is consistent with the department of Public Healths policy in terms of contingency levels, and to authorize the clerk to be able
Million,128,0 92 [speaker not understood] to a total not to exceed amount of 17. 6 million. That you also amend the proposed resolution to require any expenditures under the third amendment of the contract between dph and med impact that exceed 10 of the third amendments board committeevv of 7 92,4 28 be submitted to the Health Commission for approval and that you approve the proposed ordinance as amended. Thank you. And, mr. Rose, with regards to the second recommendation to amend the resolution to require that any expenditures in the third amendment that exceed 10 go back to the Health Commission for approval, is this current policy with the Health Commission . That is consistent with their current policy, that is correct, madam chair, supervisor avalos. Thank you very much. To the department, those two recommendations, wanted to hear from you. One sounds like it is a policy that is already dictated by the Health Commission, your department. Second one weve actually seen a previous i
Policy in terms of contingency levels, and to authorize the clerk to be able to make these amendments to the legislation. And so weve got that amendment. And to approve the underlying item as amended. So, weve got that motion. Well do that without objection. Thank you. I just want to let the department know i will need to work with them to get a new signature on [speaker not understood]. Thank you. The department will work to make sure that our clerk gets that information as quickly as possible so that we dont have any delays, that would be great. Thank you. Item 4, please. Item number 4, resolution approving amendment number one to contract no. Sfmta201308 with new flyer of america, incorporated to purchase 17 additional 40foot low floor diesel hybrid buses through the cooperative purchasing venture established by the state of Minnesota Materials Management Division for an additional amount of 11,7 80,00 5, and a total contract amount of 48,6 69,369. Thank you very much. On this item
Proposed not to exceed amount of 18. 7 million includes a 12 contingency of over 2 million which was calculated using the total actual as well as proposed contract expenditures of 16,700,000, the six year term from july 1st, 2008, to june 30, 2014. So, that includes 9. 4 million which has already been expended on the contract, and clearly that should not be included in the contingency calculation. A 12 contingency should be calculated on the proposed expenditures for fiscal year 1213 and 1314 of 7,2 92,0 48, not on the prior actual expenditures. So, that would result in a contingency amount of 8,075,092 rather than [speaker not understood]. That contingency they calculated would equal 27. 5 of the proposed 1213 1213 and 1314 expenditures. A 12 contingency would result in a total reduction of a million 128,94 2. So, our recommendation, supervisors, on page 7 of our report, we recommend that you amendedth proposed resolution to reduce the ton exceed contract amount by a million,128,0 92