severe weather threat today. many are in areas that are still reeling from a powerful storm that swept through earlier this week. britley ritz has been tracking all of these threats. what are we expecting to see? unfortunately, all the same hazards that we saw over the last 24 hours and flooding yet again. something to note is, try not to go in or around flooded waterways or roadways just so you don t put emergency personnel in danger or yourself. we have 2-plus inches of water an hour in central florida, ocala already dealing with that. we have flood watches now extending through the big bend including tallahassee and mobile and pensacola. these areas could get 6-plus inches of rain in the next 48 hours. areas highlighted in orange have that enhanced risk stretching back down into north central texas. long-lived tornados in dallas, jackson, mobile, tampa. these areas can also see tornados. it s just a smaller risk. know where your safe spot is. get there as soon as that wa
be very clear. not one republican should vote for this deal. it is a bad deal. i thought the last plan wasn t good enough. i had no idea. i had no idea that we would see a plan as ephemeral as this plan. anyone who s spent any time on capitol hill will tell you those hard liners were probably never going to vote for any compromise. by necessity, it would not be what they wanted, which was major spending cuts to social programs but here is where it gets tricky. as part of the deal to get the gavel, mccarthy put a number of those hard liners on the rules committee in the house. and now two of them, chip roy and ralph norman, are openly trying to sink deal. will they, even though they re trying to sink it, still allow it to go to the floor for a vote? that that is an open question. we re going to ask garrett haake about it in a moment. there s also the question of whether enough house dems will sign on. the conventional wisdom is yes. that there s no way democrats will all
year anniversary in nashville, tennessee, six innocents losiv.t their lives, three of them nine year olds. the faces of-year-ol these beaul children are imprinted on my heart. heart.any parent s in thisof the country, i wake up i nnmilies the middle of the night thinking about these families and praying fo prayir them. i cannot conceive of the depthsd of their pain. as americans, we need to haveen an open, honest discussion about how to protectren, our children to morrow. not decades from now. tomorrow. what is the real practical solution? what would actually save liveses ? republican talk of menta l health has merit, but how dof you fix this legislatively?s it s hard to think about. it seems nearly impossiblefix th to fix the human heart or the human mind from the halls of congress. humanand as for the drumbeat fn control, let s say just the theory that you abolish the second amendment and ban guns entirel y, that would fix precisely nothing. there ar fix precie currently mi
Inaccuracies in your question. You started by saying that this ruling seemed to ban, or make it a criminal case to ban ivf, and thats simply not what happened. In alabama, the Supreme Court, what they actually ruled was that parents of embryos of their own children could bring a wrongful death lawsuit to an ivf clinic that was negligent, criminally negligent, in allowing their babies to be smashed and killed, which is what happened in alabama. In alabama, an ivf clinic had their children frozen on ice. They didnt secure the door. Someone came in and literally smashed the children. But theyre not children frozen on ice. I mean, i think people listening and watching this. They are the Sons And Daughters of these couples. Will find that phrase completely bizarre. If i may finish, they are the Sons And Daughters of these couples that longed for children, and they longed for these children so much that then when they were negligently killed by the ivf clinic, these parents of their children
Lila rose, in southern california, welcome to hardtalk. Thanks for having me, stephen. Its a great pleasure to have you on the show. Ijust wonder if, right now, you feel you are wrestling with the law of unintended consequences. You welcomed that Supreme Court decision to overturn roe v wade, but since that happened a couple of years ago, its become clear that most americans do not want to see a womans right to choose an abortion to be outlawed and overturned. Thats become a big problem for you, hasnt it . Well, to be clear, the majority of americans actually support abortion restriction, stephen, which is not the case for pro abortion activists in this country. So those that are bewailing the overturning of roe v wade and Planned Parenthood are some of these very activistic, pro abortion groups, they dont want any Abortion Restrictions. And as you know, even in most european countries, abortion is largely restricted after the first trimester. Thats not so in the United States. In fact