what is much more insane is that when the word fukushima is mentioned, most people everywhere now think of a nuclear accident that killed a vast number of people. and this is ridiculous. it was a tsunami one of the worst tsunamis for a long time. it so happened that a nuclear power station was disabled by the tsunami, but that is all. mmm. it wasn t a nuclear accident. you ve described humanity s failure to really embrace nuclear power as a massive act of planetary self harm . yes. but you re not winning that argument. have you conceded that you probably will never win it? i m not sure about that. i think that when the burning of fossil fuels really becomes untenable because it s doing
is that when the word fukushima is mentioned, most people everywhere now think of a nuclear accident that killed a vast number of people. and this is ridiculous. it was a tsunami one of the worst tsunamis for a long time. it so happened that a nuclear power station was disabled by the tsunami, but that is all. it wasn t a nuclear accident. you ve described humanity s failure to really embrace nuclear power as a massive act of planetary self harm . yes. but you re not winning that argument. have you conceded that you probably will never win it? i m not sure about that. i think that when the burning of fossil fuels really becomes untenable because it s doing so much damage and it s
is that when the word fukushima is mentioned, most people everywhere now think of a nuclear accident that killed a vast number of people. and this is ridiculous. it was a tsunami one of the worst tsunamis for a long time. it so happened that a nuclear power station was disabled by the tsunami, but that is all. mmm. it wasn t a nuclear accident. you ve described humanity s failure to really embrace nuclear power as a massive act of planetary self harm . yes. but you re not winning that argument. have you conceded that you probably will never win it? i m not sure about that. i think that when the burning of fossil fuels really becomes untenable because it s doing so much damage and it s shut down, they ve got to get the energy from somewhere
fukushima is mentioned, most people everywhere now think of a nuclear accident that killed a vast number of people. and this is ridiculous. it was a tsunami one of the worst tsunamis for a long time. it so happened that a nuclear power station was disabled by the tsunami, but that is all. mmm. it wasn t a nuclear accident. you ve described humanity s failure to really embrace nuclear power as a massive act of planetary self harm . yes. but you re not winning that argument. have you conceded that you probably will never win it? i m not sure about that. i think that when the burning of fossil fuels really becomes untenable because it s doing so much damage,