prove the water came from our backyard. there is no evidence that the walls are not on or property they have had anything we have let them bring whoever they want to bring surveyiers, anyone we have never seen a survey report we have been completely transparent. the construction of the corner property. of devisidaro and washington built a 12 car garage, their contractor said oh, my god you need to contact these neighbors, they re in horrible condition, that s when we brought our contractors, they re in horrible condition, they re your neighboring walls, we went to martin ron, of the three surveys, had all done surveys, the devisidaro, the washington and our property, look at them they all show the same thing, the walls are not on your property, you don t need a survey there s already been three surveys, as we started discussing with the neighbors, saying, hey these sit under your wall the washington wall goes passed our property all the way to the street it doesn t stop where
level. if we had evidence here and had gone to dbi and demonstrated that with the survey like the last surveyier, martin ron did, we wouldn t have this discussion, because the information that is in front of us surveyed states in your own package states it s not. i need to see my point is that the footings are not in the devisidaro street properties. i haven t seen any evidence in the package to demonstrate. other than you have done a survey that is not in the package, right? no i m not explaining myself clearly, the decision was, the martin ron, survey itself we look at the martin ron survey for this location it shows it s over the line on the survey meaning, he himself is showing the wall over the line what is the necessity to show further when their own surveyier showed it over the line. two feet up. two feet up. if we marked the walls, we would have showed abcd we would have found the same locations and found the same results. did you take measurements at th
requested to submit. you all requested to submit but was not allowed. can you tell me about that? i m pat pam white. the project sponsor. the question again? the question was about the 2 pages of briefing that i rejected. basically the two page letter was concluded in the briefing and prepared by the permit holder. it was basically argument and exceeded the 12 pages. okay. it was not acceptable and if she wanted to present it tonight she can ask you to accept it. i believe mr. zaretzky prepared a response to it and it passed the deadline so he can ask you to submit it. that s okay. it s not necessary because we kind of did our share of what we put together and steve did his and he kind of put everything together and brought it to cynthia. i think there is too much. it was in error altogether. okay. so, i m sorry? starting your time. okay, thank you. one thing that i wanted to say is that i brought this set of plans that we signed that were stamped with the b
joined by frank fung, hurtado, and lazarus will be absent this evening. the department city attorney is here and victor pacheco and i m the executive director. we are joined by the city of the department that have cases before the board. scott sanchez is here, the zoning administrator and representing the planning commission, and senior building inspector, mr. duffy and bureau of urban forestry and department of public works and john kwaung the manager of street use and mapping. mr. pacheco, at this time if you would please go over the meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. the clerk: the board request that you turn off all phones and pagers so they do not disrupt the proceedings. please carry on conversation in the hall ways. appellant and permit holders have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttals. people affiliated must include their comments within the 7-minute period. members who are not affiliated with the parties have up to 3 min
just wanted to say with this here, i know if you can underline on july 5th, irving zaretzky keeps saying he had no idea about the height. i saw this letter or may 3, 2013. he saw this on july 5, 2012. it clearly states 3 points of our house unbeknownst to us that he measured and he filed the date after he found out that our height was not correct. one thing i want to say is i have reached out and tried to talk to neighbors. i feel that irving doesn t even live on the block and he has somehow been very crafty at eliminating. sorry your time is up. i have some questions. is the deck enlarged? no. it s not enlarged. the plans, the permit that we have i think was issued may 23, 2013, our deck, everything we have built and i wrote this to scott after because i think he s been away for a few months. i just wanted to remind them that we have not made any exterior changes that were not on those plans that the permit said was approved may 23, 2013. which we were allowed, the boa