Discussion on former donald trump. The Justice System right . Vice president and the Heritage Foundation institute for nutritional government. [applause] welcome to the Heritage Foundation. We are here today to discuss timely and important topic especially for those deeply about didnt law and criminal justice. Its a fact that many have come to believe some federal and state prosecutors are operating a rigged system of justice hurting conservatives in general on former President Donald Trump in particular. Emirate activities including operation hurricane that built into the schedule pollution and junk campaign in 2015 the contrast Hillary Clinton classified documents case was handled and ongoing abuses of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act determined the biden case and failure to arrest people protesting that homes to the u. S. Supreme court and failure to arrest anyonefa vandalizing centers and prolife protesters and concerned parents forcing Objectives School board meetings andct f
In global news, business and sport. And as well be reporting later, apparently millennials are shunning the hallowed sport of golf. Too expensive . Takes too long . Certainly not online is it golf or the fault of the millennials . You can be part of the conversation, just use the hashtag bbc the briefing. The parents of 13 children rescued from a house in california have pleaded not guilty to charges of torture, abuse and false imprisonment. David and Louise Turpin were arrested after one of their daughters managed to escape and raised the alarm. A District Attorney said the rest of the children, aged between two and 29, were found at the property east of los angeles. They were severely malnourished, with brain and nerve damage, some of them chained to their beds. The bbcs james cook reports from los angeles. David turpin appearing in court to deny torturing his own children and sexually abusing one of his young daughters. His wife, louise, also pleaded not guilty. The couple are accus
From her Previous Post that new yorks department of Public Health and Mental Hygiene and the u. S. Department of health and human services. And dr. Hamburg, we thank you for sharing your expertise with the committee and being here today. Your statement which is an extensive statement, which i got through yesterday, last night, it will be a part of the record in its entirety. Id like to ask maybe, giddy up to 10 minutes to go through that, if youd like rather than just five, but maybe, however close you can keep it but below 10 minutes. Im going to request the record remain open for 10 days for senator smiths statement or questions for the record. A couple things, at 10 30 i have to leave. You probably do, too. Both of us have to leave. [inaudible conversations] good. And then i think, well, we have i think senator franken said he will take over at that time if we continue on beyond that, beyond that time but we are managing a bill on the floor that we have to leave four at 10 30. So ag
[captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2014] mike rogers, president obamas nominee to head the National Security agency testifies he for the Senate Armed Services committee. Willinen Security Council bring you live on a resolution to russian intervention and ukraine. The suggestion is when we say thinkom of choice what i we often mean is they know best. The government does not know best. The notion of a tonic me au a onewordbasically way of saying people know better than outsiders do about what will make their lives go well. This sounds kind of academic and abstract. The stakes are real and can create. The question we think about our policies, at least they love to the question is are people going to be sick . Are they going to be miserable. Dead . Ey going to be if we have some policy whether it involves savings for retirement or privacy on the internet or if it involves air quality, if we can think of some way that makes them less likely to be sick or miserable or dead, w
Decisions that often come out. That is a crude split. Justices do not line up in any particular way. Labels, ict on those dont think theyre particularly helpful in articulating anyone who is a judge, what their philosophy would be. It is not the goal of a judge to come into it with a preconceived vision. You are supposed to decide cases. That is how i would approach it. You have written that you were concerned with decisions that only looked to Prior Supreme Court opinions, statutes, regulations. You said that this kind of constitutional decisionmaking without looking to lot refuse, literature, treaties can be called cranach and technical cramped and technical. What role would lot reviews lot refuse having your judicial lot reviews law reviews having your judicial . I want to clarify on that comment. That writing with the blog post. It was making an early observation about opinions from a justice. I noted in that same post that there was also much to be said law approach. The certainly