It is going up to 0. 15 and we reallocated it from another line item in the historic preservation. What 0. 05 mean, you could be divided on the way to work . Just kidding. But, maybe, you know, i dont know if the Preservation Commission wants more that may be something that if they did not like the 250,000 for the secretary of interior standards perhaps you could ask them for more money for that use they have been reporting the Response Time but they asked us to kind of up our part of it. Okay. Yeah, but you see that is a onetime expense that they may be more amenable too. At one point, enforcement came up. As an issue. You are not adding more to enforcement . We are adding one. And adding one in the supplemental. Or one of the supplemental or one in the proposed budget and one will be for the solely preservation projects thank you. Commissioner wu. Over all i am supportive. I have a question on one of the grants. It says here that you are not sure yet the Transportation Planning grant
Preservation and they recommended approval for the fiscal year, 13, 14 budget to the commission and, they did request three modifications to the departments budget which i would like to give you an overview of right now. So the first thing that they requested a modification for was to increase the departments proposed staffing allegation, for Community Initiated surveys and landmark designations in the departments work program in fiscal year, 13 14, we had an fte allocation of 0. 05 of an fte and i requested that we increase it and in talking with the Historic Preservation coordinator tim fly we decided to increase it to 3. 15 of an fte in 13, 14, and 14, 15. The second modification request was to identify Funding Sources and staff time to complete the surveys initiated by the former Redevelopment Agency and at this time, the development is working with the redevelopment staff to understand what obligations might exist to continue work on these projects. The third modification request