transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn t get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it s against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it s an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it s conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what s called an interlocutory or intermediate appeal. i m really copeland, we need your georgia expertise to untangle what is going on in the speedy trial situation, which suddenly just became, maybe, not so speedy. district attorney willis saying, to the judge, wait a minute,
official duties as the chief of staff, even if a number of the other overt acts were within the scope. what does that mean? it means i would assume, because i don t know the precise answer, that, maybe, the entire case does get transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn t get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it s against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it s an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it s conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what s called an interlocutory or intermediate