transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn t get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it s against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it s an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it s conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what s called an interlocutory or intermediate appeal. i m really copeland, we need your georgia expertise to untangle what is going on in the speedy trial situation, which suddenly just became, maybe, not so speedy. district attorney willis saying, to the judge, wait a minute,
appeal. i m really copeland, we need your georgia expertise to untangle what is going on in the speedy trial situation, which suddenly just became, maybe, not so speedy. district attorney willis saying, to the judge, wait a minute, you have, in effect, with your scheduling order for one trial, for one defendant, severed that defendant without there being a motion to sever. district attorney willis is saying, we have to all get back together in court and talk about this. that s exactly what she is saying. the statute does give the judge the discretion to sever it, as long as he s not violating the law, or making it a fact, he has the discussion to separate. notice in the hearing, the hallmarks of a legal system. that s what i think miss willis is saying. we want to be heard on this before you do it. mr. chesebro as filed a demand for a speedy trial. under georgia statute, if he