Concern to me. We are going from a 3500 unit building to a 4800 unit building , but if we are going to two decent sized units, i am good with that. I get there some impact, but i think weve got to look at the zoning and kind of maximize out the number of units that we can add here. Granted, we can add an a. D. U. Under the current zoning, im just suspect that it gets a little Winchester Mystery House and the layout. I take d. R. , approve the project eliminating the a. D. U. And incorporating that into the lower unit. It is a little counter to what we asked for before, and we dont have those plans necessarily, but even if that is the intent, we want to continue with some direction to the project sponsor, but let me try that. I will make a motion to take d. R. And approve the project, incorporating the a. D. U. Into the laurel unit to get us two equal sized units and approve the project. Second. There is a motion that has been seconded to take d. R. And approve the project with modifica
It. And also, we did research about the impact of the Third Addition from the front street and the back street. From the front street, these red lines are the site that you can see. So according to this research, you can see only a bit of the building above, the corner of the building. So we dabble that you can see, you know, the third story from the front street. But we dont recognise it because of this setback. I did research about the visibility from the backyard, the alley. And according to my research, the elevation angle, the difference between the elevation angle between the second and third story is only 7degrees. So if we had a third story, our elevation angle differs, increase of only 7degrees. Its not like 35 or 45. So its not that much. So based on the research, i concluded that not much skyview is blocked by the audition of the third floor. Im the owner of this property and would like to thank you for your time today and would like to mention one thing that there are three
Invasive to privacy. Private views are not protected by the planning code or the design guidelines. Staff recommends not taking d. R. And approving the project because there were no exceptionally or extruder conditions. Can we hear from the d. R. Requesters . Good afternoon. Im here today because i believe the proposed project would have a Significant Impact on me, mainly the diminished to use an increase in the of the glare in the morning and increase of the openness and diminished property. We have a deck that is off our kitchen and breakfast room area. This is a place where our grandchildren play and we enjoy the sunlight and existing view that is our private area. It will affect our downstairs family room and affect the loss of sunlight in the afternoon and the diminished privacy. Our bedroom also faces west and will suffer the same fate and an increase glare in the mornings. These are our most favourite places in the home and we are sensitive to conditions that will affect them. T
Items one a and b. Conditional use and variance are proposed for continuance by august 29th , 2019. Item number two is 2417 green street, appeal of the preliminary negative declaration proposed for continuance on till september 19th, 2019. Item number three is 50 post street downtown project authorization proposed for continuance until october 17th , 2019. An item four is a conditional use authorization proposed for indefinite continuance. I have no other items proposed for continuance and i have no speaker cards. Do any members of the public wish to speak to the items on the ticketed on the continuance calendar, specifically about the continuance of the items . Okay. With that, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. I move to moved to continue as noted. Second. Thank you, on that motion to continue items as proposed. [roll call] so moved. That motion passes unanimously 5 0. I will also continue item one b. Until august 29th, as well. Thank you for that. Placing as under the con
Hearing for thursday, july 28, 2022. In person and remote hybrid meeting will require everyones attention and most of all our patience if youre joining remotely and not speaking, please mute your microphone. To enable public paiks, sf gov tv is broadcasting this hearing live and well receive Public Comment on todays agenda comments and you can call 4156550001 and entering access code 24892534904. We will take Public Comment for those persons in city hall first and open up the Remote Access line. Please speak clearly and slowly and if you care to state your name for the record. Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes. We have 30 seconds remaining, youll hear a chime indicating your time is almost up. Ill tell you your time is up and take the next person queued to speak. Those calling in to submit your testimony, when we reach the item youre interested in speaking to, press star three to be added to the queue. When you hear your line has been unmuted thats your indication to beg